Seed Media Group

Search this blog

Profile

me.jpg

I am the Online Community Manager at PLoS-ONE (Public Library of Science). My job is to try to motivate you to comment on the papers there. My scientific specialty is chronobiology (circadian rhythms and photoperiodism), with additional interests in comparative physiology, animal behavior and evolution. You can contact me at: Coturnix@gmail.com

I Support the Public Library of Science

Buy the 2007 Science Blogging Anthology:

The Open Laboratory

Buy the 2006 Science Blogging Anthology:

The Open Laboratory

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Subscribe via Email

Stay abreast of your favorite bloggers' latest and greatest via e-mail, via a daily digest.

Sign me up!

My Old Stuff

Read the archives of my old blogs:

Science And Politics

Circadiana

The Magic School Bus

Make Me Happy

Add this blog to my Technorati Favorites!

Add Scienceblogs to your Technorati Favorites!

Make Me Solvent

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More

A Blog Around The Clock swag store

Resources

Dictionary of Circadian Physiology

Basic Terms and Concepts in Math and Science

TalkOrigins

Find Science Blogs

I Support

Project Exploration

Project Exploration

Bloggie Stuff

« An eye-catching yet flawed bar graph | Main | Potential abuse of users' privacy in Serbia »

Innumeracy and related academic turf-defenses....

Category: Academia
Posted on: July 26, 2008 7:10 PM, by Coturnix

Chad: Innumeracy by John Allen Paulos

Tom: What Does the Public Really Need To Know?: Science/Math edition.

Chad: The Innumeracy of Intellectuals

Janet: Fear and loathing in the academy.

Join in the fray....

Comments

OK. We can do a few things:

1. We could try to establish what people MUST know by way of math.

2. We could figure out when they should know that.

3. We could stop being surly about our own expertise and realize most people don't need to share it or even have a vague notion of what we do.

4. We could let people choose what they need to know with some competing and carefully vetted guidelines that are non-binding. Remarkably, people will jump through the hoops that have value to them. We all do it.

5. We could stop acting as if there is some idea of a discipline that entails a certain set of knowing. That's crap. It doesn't exist. Get over it.

Posted by: Ryan Lanham | July 26, 2008 9:49 PM

Those are 5 good questions.

But who is the "we" of "We could try to establish what people MUST know by way of math" and the other 4?

We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union... and intersection?

We, the pillars of the institutional Science edifice?

We, the Sciencebloggers?

We, the majority of adults who don't know whether the Earth revolves around the Sun or the Sun revolves around the earth, whether an atom or an electron is larger, whether one can see the Venus by day with the naked eye from the surface of the earth, and who don't know how to do compound interest arithmetic?

We, the uncredentialed Boards of Education of local communities?

We, the national Academy of Science?

We, the bureaucrats of the Department of Education, with unwavering dedication to President Bush's great legacy, No Child Left behind?

Begs the question. Who should ask the questions, answer the questions, weight the answers, develop the policies, execute the policies, do the math?

Posted by: Jonathan Vos Post | July 27, 2008 1:34 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting? (UPDATED)

Blogs in the Network

Advertisement

Top Five: Readers' Picks

Search All Blogs

Top Science Stories

powered by SEED - seedmagazine.com