Now on ScienceBlogs: Charles Darwin February 12, 1809 - April 19, 1882

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Search

Profile

Matthew C. Nisbet, Ph.D, is Associate Professor in the School of Communication at American University where his research focuses on the intersections among science, media, and society. E-MAIL: nisbetmc@gmail.com

Wikio - Top Blogs - Sciences

Comment Policy

Upcoming Talks

Spotlight on Research & Commentary

Sci-Comm Journals

Science News Agenda-Setters

UK, Canada, & Australia

News Wires

Social Media to Watch

Podcasts on Science, Society, and Communication

Research Centers: Science & Society

Research Centers: Media, Politics, Society

Media & Culture

« In Toronto, Former World Bank Official Delivers a Different Kind of Economic Framing on Climate Change | Main | The Buffyverse and Incidental Exposure to Science »

That's Infotainment! Iraq, Anna Nicole, and Astronaut Scandal Dominate Most Heavily Covered Issues Since Start of Year; Global Warming Fails to Place in the Top Ten

Category: Global WarmingIssue Attention Cycles
Posted on: February 20, 2007 4:07 PM, by Matthew C. Nisbet

The major news organizations, especially the big three cable news networks, need a crash courses in ethics. Given all the major issues taking place in the world, how can they continue to pander to the American public's most base instincts with 24 hour coverage of Anna Nicole Smith?

Witness the analysis for the top most covered stories at the major news outlets over the last five weeks, as indexed by Pew.

1. Iraq Policy Debate - 12%
2. Events in Iraq - 10%
3. Anna Nicole Smith Dies - 9%
4. Campaign 2008 - 8%
5. Astronaut Scandal - 6%
6. Severe Weather - 3%
7. Super Bowl - 3%
8. Libby Trial - 3%
9. Bush's Budget Proposal - 3%
10. Iran - 2%

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/33810

Comments

1

I've mentioned this at another blog, but to further illustrate your point, one might recall that Laci Peterson died in Dec. 2002, and that story dominated the airwaves while the country was heading towards war with Iraq. And we know what the consequences of that were.

This point is particularly relevant given the rumblings regarding Iran. I noted that Joe Scarborough, who night after night had been warning about potential war with Iran, devoted his entire program the night of Anna Nicole Smith's death to her.

An explanation that seems reasonable to me is that this highlights the profit driven orientation of the news media (at least on television.) Smith's death coverage can generate ratings, yet it doesn't really require any investment and doesn't upset any potential contributors politics.

Posted by: m.b.f. | February 21, 2007 1:43 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.