To be honest, I hadn't seen the online program Bloggingheads.tv before. But today they offer a pretty substantive discussion of our Framing Science thesis. Apparently the host agrees with us. His co-host misunderstands our goals for communication and the research on framing and media influence. But that's okay. It's clearly meant to be a point/counter-point. Kind of a Siskel and Ebert of blog commentary. Pretty cool.
Framing Science
What's Next in Public Engagement?
Search
Profile
Matthew C. Nisbet, Ph.D, is Associate Professor in the School of Communication at American University where his research focuses on the intersections among science, media, and society. E-MAIL: nisbetmc@gmail.com
Comment Policy
-
Keep it substantive, serious minded, on topic, and respectful.
Upcoming Talks
- 09.21.10 CNRS, Paris, France
- 08.23.10 Aldo Leopold Institute, Univ. of Minnesota
- 06.23.10 Aldo Leopold Institute, Stanford University
- 05.20.10 University Research Magazine Association,DC
- 05.12.10 Science Media Forum, Madrid, Spain
- 04.28.10 Science, Social Controversy, & Art, Banff, Canada
Spotlight on Research & Commentary
- Opinion leaders and climate change
- New directions in science communication
- Best practices in digital journalism
- Science media roles & responsibilities
- The framing of science debates
- Framing and the intelligent design controversy
- Public engagement on climate change
- Young Americans on climate change
- Reframing climate change as a public health issue: An exploratory study
- Covering the health risks of climate change: A news agenda-building analysis
- Time to chill out on ClimateGate
Sci-Comm Journals
Science News Agenda-Setters
- A. Revkin (Dot Earth)
- J. Broder (NYT)
- J. Eilperin(WPost)
- WPost Post Carbon blog
- C. Brainard (CJR)
- D. Samuelsohn (ClimateWire)
- C. Petit (MIT Tracker)
- S. Vedantam (WPost)
- N. Wade (NYT)
- R. Harris (NPR)
- J. Rovner (NPR)
- D. Vergano (USAT)
- R. Stein (WPost)
- S. Vedantum (WPost)
- E. Rosenthal(NYT)
- G. Kolata (NYT)
- J. Palca (NPR)
- C. Dean (NYT)
- A. Pollack (NYT)
- A. Aubrey (NPR)
- W. Broad (NYT)
- J. Tierney (NYT)
- S. Borenstein(AP)
- Yale Environment 360
- The Scientist
- Nature News
UK, Canada, & Australia
- BBC Science
- Guardian Science
- Guardian Environ
- Times UK Science
- CP: Science
- Globe & Mail: Science
- Toronto Star: Science
- TheAustralian: Sci & Nature
- Australian Broadcasting Corporation: Science
News Wires
Social Media to Watch
- NYTimes Green Inc.
- Science Insider
- Scheufele's NanoPublic
- Fleck's InkStain
- Maynard's 2020 Science
- Pielke Jr.'s Blog
- Blum's Speakeasy Science
- AGU's Plain Spoken Scientist
- Breakthrough Institute
- Real Climate
- Die Klimazwiebel
- AJOB's Bioethics.net
- Yale Media & Climate Change
- CU CEJournal
- Olson's The Benshi
- Science and Entertainment Media Exchange
- P. Camil's Global Change
- Lehrer's Frontal Cortex
- M&K's The Intersection
- Times'UK Eureka Zone
- Pew's Climate Compass
- Center for Social Media's Blog
Podcasts on Science, Society, and Communication
- CFI's Point of Inquiry
- Grothe's For Good Reason
- CBC: How to Think About Science
- NPR Science Friday
- CBC: The Age of Persuasion
Research Centers: Science & Society
- Center for Climate Change Communication
- Yale Project on Climate Change
- Science Policy, Colorado
- Institute for Science & Society (UK)
- Belfer Center, Harvard
- Loka Institute
- Public Engagement, Wellcome
- CSPO @ AZState
- NYAS Science & Society
- Communication @ Cornell University
- LSC @ University of Wisconsin
- Science Communication Observatory @ Universitat Pompeu Fabra
- Observa: Science & Society
- People, Science, & Policy (UK)
- STS @ Harvard
- Cultural Cognition Project
Research Centers: Media, Politics, Society
- SoC @ American U.
- Center for Social Media
- Investigative Reporting Workshop
- Shorenstein Center, Harvard
- Annenberg Policy Center
- Frameworks Institute
- Demos UK
- Spitfire Strategies
- Public Agenda
- Pew Excellence in Journalism
- Pew People & Press
- Pew Internet & Public Life
- Pew Religion & Public Life
Media & Culture
- PBS' Current Mag
- Philip Kennicott
- Douglas Rushkoff
- Howard Kurtz's Media Notes
- WNYC On the Media
- B. Garfield @ Advertising Age
- CJR Daily
- Jay Rosen's Press Think
- Romenesko's Daily Fix
- Jarvis' Buzz Machine
- Campbell's Media Myths
« The UN Frames Global Warming as Really about Security | Main | NPR: Are we asking scientists to be advocates? To spin false information? Read the transcript. »
BloggingHeadTV on Framing Science
Category: Enviro/Science Reporting
Posted on: April 17, 2007 5:42 PM, by Matthew C. Nisbet
TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/38398
Comments
Well, Henry is a smart guy from one of the top academic blogs in the world. The other guy speaks for Cato Institute so he has an agenda to push.
Posted by: coturnix | April 17, 2007 8:00 PM
if you mean that henry farrell is the 'host,' no, it is a diavlog. the real host is robert wright, but you don't see him. henry & will are equals.
Posted by: razib | April 17, 2007 8:54 PM
Sudden specific thought on the Framing article.
"Messages must be positive and respect diversity."
This is not always true.
This type of message seems fairly worthless for deprogramming the brainwashed. Specifically, respecting diversity is simply used as an excuse to retain the brainwashing. Being "positive" is important but difficult to do, since it's essential to discredit the brainwashers.
Of course, I doubt that any mass media message is useful for deprogramming the brainwashed.
But have no doubt: we are dealing with a lot of genuinely brainwashed people. The brainwashing techniques used by right-wing churches are pretty well documented. Therefore I think that while your arguments are good for reaching the *non-brainwashed* masses, the *brainwashed* require a different approach. What approach, I wonder?
Posted by: Nathanael Nerode | April 18, 2007 1:36 AM