Now on ScienceBlogs: HeartlandGate: Anti-Science Institute's Insider Reveals Secrets

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Search

Profile

Matthew C. Nisbet, Ph.D, is Associate Professor in the School of Communication at American University where his research focuses on the intersections among science, media, and society. E-MAIL: nisbetmc@gmail.com

Wikio - Top Blogs - Sciences

Comment Policy

Upcoming Talks

Spotlight on Research & Commentary

Sci-Comm Journals

Science News Agenda-Setters

UK, Canada, & Australia

News Wires

Social Media to Watch

Podcasts on Science, Society, and Communication

Research Centers: Science & Society

Research Centers: Media, Politics, Society

Media & Culture

« Conflict Hungry Media Feeds on (and Reinforces) the Two Americas Of Global Warming Perceptions | Main | At the journal Science, a Nisbet/Mooney focus on framing »

Proximity as Bias in Coverage of the World's Hurricane Problem

Category: Enviro/Science Reporting
Posted on: April 4, 2007 3:07 PM, by Matthew C. Nisbet

Over at The Intersection, Chris Mooney has a post up about the complete absence of U.S. news coverage dedicated to the record six tropical cyclones that have hit Madagascar, killing hundreds and causing massive damage.

It's the old proximity norm creating bias in news coverage. The result, apart from any important disaster relief reaction, is that Americans fail to get a big picture about just how global the hurricane problem might be.

Six tropical cyclones hit Madagascar over the past couple months, but you wouldn't know it if you lived in the U.S.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/37378

Comments

1

It is interesting to see it play out using Google News. The take on many stories is changed based not just nationality but locality too.

Even inoquous things like announcing Nobel prize winners, where any local connection is played up.

The internet also gives the "news consumer" a fairly easy ability to know what is going on if they care to, though many don't care to. Outside the US the local bias still exists but there is less ignorance about what is going on elsewhere. I haven't studied this in Google News but I bet you could see stories of international significance covered by many media from different countries and then a few stories with USA media coverage (and they US media would largely cover all the same stories would be my guess). And if some big USA media decide to cover say Sudan, then it is likely the others will to for a little while.

Posted by: John Hunter | April 4, 2007 5:57 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.