Now on ScienceBlogs: HeartlandGate: Anti-Science Institute's Insider Reveals Secrets
What's Next in Public Engagement?
Matthew C. Nisbet, Ph.D, is Associate Professor in the School of Communication at American University where his research focuses on the intersections among science, media, and society. E-MAIL: nisbetmc@gmail.com
« Center for Inquiry Author Attacked in India | Main | How Extreme Weather Inspired Frankenstein »
Category: Framing Science
Posted on: August 14, 2007 8:16 AM, by Matthew C. Nisbet
The Scientist is currently sponsoring an online discussion about framing and new directions in science communication. The web feature is in advance of an article I am contributing to the magazine, co-authored with Dietram Scheufele, a colleague at the University of Wisconsin. So far, more than 40 comments have been posted. There is also a reader survey at the site.
Regarding The Scientist discussion, Mary Miller has more to add in a post at her blog The Accidental Scientist.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/47546
denialism blog 02.14.2012
respectful insolence 02.14.2012
uncertain principles 02.13.2012
confessions of a science librarian 02.13.2012
starts with a bang! 02.13.2012
Comments
Why graduate students? Why not a broader group as part of the educational discipline? Is it because graduate students are defined acolytes chosen for the priesthood?
Smacks of Luntz. The target is intentionally treated as an object to be manipulated for public policy by an overclass. Yes, please conduct research to determine which psychological and physiological triggers would make me more pliant to your view, so that it can be activated at will. Cause THAT'S not liable to be abused.
Posted by: Ted | August 14, 2007 8:44 AM