Now on ScienceBlogs: Oldest Human-Made Object in Space

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Search

Profile

Matthew C. Nisbet, Ph.D, is Associate Professor in the School of Communication at American University where his research focuses on the intersections among science, media, and society. E-MAIL: nisbetmc@gmail.com

Wikio - Top Blogs - Sciences

Comment Policy

Upcoming Talks

Spotlight on Research & Commentary

Sci-Comm Journals

Science News Agenda-Setters

UK, Canada, & Australia

News Wires

Social Media to Watch

Podcasts on Science, Society, and Communication

Research Centers: Science & Society

Research Centers: Media, Politics, Society

Media & Culture

« How Strategic Framing Killed NJ Stem Cell Funding | Main | The Scientist Delusion? Nature Column on AAAS Panel »

From the Heartland Institute Directly to Conservative News

Category: FRAME: Public AccountabilityFRAME: Technical UncertaintyGlobal Warming
Posted on: March 5, 2008 11:32 AM, by Matthew C. Nisbet

As I explained yesterday, it's foolish to dismiss the potential impact of the Heartland Institute conference. The organizers have a powerful framing strategy, one that resonates strongly with conservative media outlets and many Americans. It's these kinds of successful PR strategies that continue to reinforce the "Two Americas" of global warming perceptions in the United States, with Democrats growing ever more concerned and convinced of the problem while Republicans remain skeptical, resulting in massive partisan differences in poll results across questions about global warming

Consider above the message of the Heartland Institute as featured prominently in a clip from the Glenn Beck show at the Headline News Network: the science remains uncertain and the liberal media along with liberal Hollywood leaders like Al Gore are seeking to censor rival ideas. It's the same framing and message across the major conservative news outlets, consider this clip from Fox & Friends this week, featured at the blog Think Progress.

I discuss more on the message strategy of the Heartland Institute and its likely impact today on PRI's The World.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: EnvironmentPolitics

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/65914

Comments

1

You hit the nail on the head. To global warming deniers, it's not about science. Climate has been rolled into the culture wars.

Posted by: Miles | March 5, 2008 2:30 PM

2

It is scary, it looks and smells like the Creation/ID debate in the US.

Posted by: Clifford Dubery | March 5, 2008 10:37 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.