Now on ScienceBlogs: Oh, no! School wi-fi is making our kids sick! (2012 edition)

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Gene Expression

Human evolution, genetics, genomics and their interstices

Books

Q & A

tonee.jpg
...

An Original ScienceBlog


Wikio - Top Blogs - Sciences

Search this blog


Recent Comments

Archives

Categories

Blogroll

Recent Posts

« Who believes in astrology? | Main | How I view religion »

Democrat and Republican, by the numbers  permlink

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Politics
Posted on: August 25, 2008 2:25 AM, by Razib Khan

This weblog has moved
Update your bookmarks:
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp

And RSS:
http://feeds.feedburner.com/GeneExpressionBlog


Pew has a nice survey up right now, A Closer Look at the Parties in 2008. Here are three questions, and the Republican - Democrat difference on the responses:

Do you think the US made the right or wrong decision in using military force against Iraq?, a 50 point difference on both "yes" and "no." I'll let you guess the signs!

Do you think abortion should be...

Legal in all cases -13 difference
Legal in most cases -10 difference
Illegal in most cases +19 difference
Illegal in all cases +6 difference

Books that contain dangerous ideas should be banned from public school libraries

Agree +4 difference
Disagree -2 difference

Check out the other responses. I'm struck how long-standing "Culture War" issues are actually far less stark in their dichotomy than proximate, almost epiphenomenal, policies such as the Iraq War. And when it comes to "core" values such as free speech there isn't much of a difference between the parties (though a shockingly high proportion of both Democrats and Republicans believe that books with "dangerous" ideas should be banned).

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Politics

Comments

1

razib says:
And when it comes to "core" values such as free speech there isn't much of a difference between the parties (though a shockingly high proportion of both Democrats and Republicans believe that books with "dangerous" ideas should be banned).

I don't think it would be accurate to characterize public schools refusing to propagate certain literature as "banning". There is a stark difference between being allowed the autonomy to promote certain unpopular views and having explicit help from the state in doing so.

I also suspect that if people were asked if a specifically extreme example of dangerous literature that should be refused distribution in public school libraries, you could get a much higher percentage from both parties accepting limitations. Try asking them whether they would accept literature from NAMBLA or something? Suddenly promoting a diversity of view-points will take a backseat to other concerns.

Posted by: B.B. | August 25, 2008 12:42 PM

2

And when it comes to "core" values such as free speech there isn't much of a difference between the parties (though a shockingly high proportion of both Democrats and Republicans believe that books with "dangerous" ideas should be banned).

I would imagine that they would differ considerably as to what constitutes a "dangerous" idea, however.

Really, I think most people want the same things in the abstract: less crime, less poverty, clean environment, economic prosperity, etc.. They just have wildly different ideas of how to accomplish it.

Posted by: Salamander | August 26, 2008 1:54 PM

3

Really, I think most people want the same things in the abstract: less crime, less poverty, clean environment, economic prosperity, etc.. They just have wildly different ideas of how to accomplish it.

Dead on the money.

Posted by: Arcane | August 27, 2008 12:59 AM

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.