Now on ScienceBlogs: A study that oversells massage therapy

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Gene Expression

Human evolution, genetics, genomics and their interstices

Books

Q & A

tonee.jpg
...

An Original ScienceBlog


Wikio - Top Blogs - Sciences

Search this blog


Recent Comments

Archives

Categories

Blogroll

Recent Posts

« Your religion is false | Main | Asian Buddhists believe in God »

Neandertal phylogeography  permlink

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Environment
Posted on: April 15, 2009 11:21 AM, by Razib Khan

This weblog has moved
Update your bookmarks:
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp

And RSS:
http://feeds.feedburner.com/GeneExpressionBlog


Genetic Evidence of Geographical Groups among Neanderthals:

The Neanderthals are a well-distinguished Middle Pleistocene population which inhabited a vast geographical area extending from Europe to western Asia and the Middle East. Since the 1950s paleoanthropological studies have suggested variability in this group. Different sub-groups have been identified in western Europe, in southern Europe and in the Middle East. On the other hand, since 1997, research has been published in paleogenetics, carried out on 15 mtDNA sequences from 12 Neanderthals. In this paper we used a new methodology derived from different bioinformatic models based on data from genetics, demography and paleoanthropology. The adequacy of each model was measured by comparisons between simulated results (obtained by BayesianSSC software) and those estimated from nucleotide sequences (obtained by DNAsp4 software). The conclusions of this study are consistent with existing paleoanthropological research and show that Neanderthals can be divided into at least three groups: one in western Europe, a second in the Southern area and a third in western Asia. Moreover, it seems from our results that the size of the Neanderthal population was not constant and that some migration occurred among the demes.

Here's a schematic showing the models that they tested, with 3 being the one that the data support:

journal.pone.0005151.g001.png

And a map of the regions which these where these three populations were extant:
journal.pone.0005151.g002.png

The authors are careful to hedge and caution a great deal about these findings. Small sample sizes as well as fragmentary genetic material (only mtDNA) means that one should take the conclusions with a grain of salt. But to be frank the same issues with the size and representativeness of data sets could be brought to bear to critique conventional paleoanthropology with its reliance on a small number of fossils, so it seems that this sort of work will be a useful supplement.

Citation: Fabre V, Condemi S, Degioanni A (2009) Genetic Evidence of Geographical Groups among Neanderthals. PLoS ONE 4(4): e5151. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005151

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Environment

Comments

1

As I'm sure you're aware, any discussion of population grouping makes you a total racist.

You must be really insecure if you're fascinated by population data. Why do you hate neandertals so much?

Posted by: Spaulding | April 15, 2009 12:55 PM

2

As I am sure #1 is aware, any snide comments on racism makes one an a$$hole.

Posted by: Gill Bates | April 17, 2009 8:28 AM

3

Why was Spaulding's comment even posted?

Posted by: Steve Singer | April 17, 2009 10:46 PM

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.