Now on ScienceBlogs: HeartlandGate: Anti-Science Institute's Insider Reveals Secrets

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Gene Expression

Human evolution, genetics, genomics and their interstices

Books

Q & A

tonee.jpg
...

An Original ScienceBlog


Wikio - Top Blogs - Sciences

Search this blog


Recent Comments

Archives

Categories

Blogroll

Recent Posts

« Bonus Katz | Main | Why Pakistanis are more Muslim than thou »

Gap in attitudes toward interracial marriage gone  permlink

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Humanities & Social Science
Posted on: February 1, 2010 6:54 PM, by Razib Khan

This weblog has moved
Update your bookmarks:
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp

And RSS:
http://feeds.feedburner.com/GeneExpressionBlog


Pew has a new report out, Almost All Millennials Accept Interracial Dating and Marriage. Pretty straightforward. But one thing that I found interesting, if not surprising, was that the gap in black-white attitudes had basically disappeared over the generations. I made a chart to illustrate this:

interracgap.png

In fact, in more recent generations whites seem somewhat more accepting of interracial marriage within the family than blacks. I suspect that the black-white gap for Millennials and Gen-Xers is within the margin of error, but it's suggestive that the gap grew from the latter to the former.

1480-3 (1).gifAlso, Pew has been tracking attitudes by generation for 20 years, and all have become more tolerant of intermarriage. But what's up with the change around 1990? I don't see it noted within the Pew analysis, so I wonder if they reworded the question and massaged the responses inadvertently, and don't want to revisit that error.

Finally, I think it is important to remember that though most young people tolerate interracial relationships and marriages, there are very strong same-race preferences on an individual level in regards to choices. This is probably important to keep in mind if you're an ethnic minority and looking to use a dating service or site, especially if you're a male, as women tend to be pickier on these sites than men already. There is a disjunction between broad public acceptance in the abstract for mixed-marriage and dating, and concrete preferences for someone that matches one's own phenotype personally (not to mention realities such as residential, social and cultural segregation which are strongly correlated with race). I think that explains the whiteness of The Bachelor & The Bachelorette reality dating shows, which ostensibly end in a marriage proposal. If the bachelor and bachelorette exhibited normal American preferences their immediate elimination of individuals who were of other races would be evident, and probably embarrass everyone involved.

H/T Inductivist

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Humanities & Social Science

Comments

1

A related issue that may be that a lot of the people getting married still need to keep the older generations happy. So even if a Gen-Xer or Millennial is fine with interracial marriage, if they have important older relatives (parents especially) who are not happy with intermarriage, the young individuals may be less inclined to date people outside their own racial groups, since they need to worry about potentially negative family responses.

Posted by: Joshua Zelinsky | February 1, 2010 9:30 PM

2

"If the bachelor and bachelorette exhibited normal American preferences their immediate elimination of individuals who were of other races would be evident, and probably embarrass everyone involved."

I once saw an Australian dating show in which one blonde woman had to pick 3 guys from a bunch of about 20 guys, who were almost entirely white. She walked down the line of them, eliminating each one with comments like, "He's not tall enough," or "Don't like his hairstyle," or "Don't care for his shirt." Upon reaching the sixth guy, who was South Asian, she simply said, "Not today, sorry."
Ouch.

Posted by: Eurasian Sensation | February 1, 2010 9:53 PM

3

Action speaks louder than the words. We shall find out in about a decade!

Posted by: George | February 2, 2010 10:01 AM

4

you have to love a pundit who can classify Mary Delgado as non-White.I guess a Spanish surname trumps physiognomy.

Posted by: trajan23 | February 2, 2010 2:45 PM

5

People will often say that they have no problems with interracial marriage because they know it is politically incorrect to say otherwise. In today's society, lying is often more socially acceptable than being honest about such matters.

Posted by: Joe Walker | February 3, 2010 7:28 PM

6

hey eurasian sensation i think you are lying through your teeth, i have been to australia, and australia is very accepting of interracial dating, just because some dating show had some lady who says that about that asian guy it probably was not at all due to his race but his clothes or appearance, etc.

Posted by: kdogg | March 20, 2010 2:28 AM

7

@ kdogg: who are you to say I'm lying through my teeth? I'm relating something I saw, exactly how it happened. It may have meant nothing, but I thought it was interesting.

You've visited Australia? Congratulations. I live there, but I'm sure you know more about it than I do.

Posted by: Eurasian Sensation | March 20, 2010 10:53 AM

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.