Seed Media Group

No Se Nada

Science and (culture, politics, policy, media)

Search this blog

Profile

vranespic.jpg Kevin Vranes has a phud in Physical Ocean- ography and Cli- matology. He now studies sci- ence policy and politics at the CSTPR. (More in the about.)

email: kevin {/at/} nosenada.org
Comments policy

Recent Posts

required reading


  The Contested Plains
  On Killing
  The Wisdom of Crowds
  The Tipping Point
  On Combat
  The Botany of Desire
  Freakanomics
  Midnight's Children

Categories

Recent Comments

Archives

the usual suspects

(listed in semi-random order)


  prometheus (sci. pol.)
  Boulder Coffee
  john fleck (ideas)
  brian schmidt (ideas)
  andrew alden (geology)
  james annan (climate)
  realclimate (climate)
  dan collins (geo-)
  pielke sr. (climate)
  sylvia tognetti (sci. pol.)
  andrew dessler (climate)
  bob park (physics/sci pol)
  chris rowan (geology)
  charles magee (geo-)
  wg/co (geology)
  yami mcmoots (geology)
  sean davis (clouds)
  reason: hit and run (politics)
  point380 climate consulting
  colorado pols (CO politics)
  colo. confidential (CO politics)


Subscribe via Email

Stay abreast of your favorite bloggers' latest and greatest via e-mail, via a daily digest.

Sign me up!

« Protecting the peace by reviewing tenured professors | Main | The lunacy of UAL, DALRQ, AA and CAL and another energy rant »

Some thoughts on the horrible Olympic coverage by the NY Times

Category: Totally random
Posted on: February 26, 2006 12:01 PM, by Kevin Vranes

As a very interested athlete, I grew more and more annoyed each passing Olympic day with the NY Times sports coverage of the games.

The worst offender was Selena Roberts and her column after sour-pussed column, written as if she had been ass-grabbed before the games by Bode Miller and so had a strong vendetta against him and everything else American.

It went beyond Roberts, though, and the consistently negative and catty coverage was building on my psyche. The Times made the athletes pay unfairly for the overhyping sins of the USOC, advertisers and the media. Further, the Times' editors seemed to have conducted a poll of Americans and found that they were only interested in alpine skiing and consistently snide recounts of failure.

Today was the culmination of my frustration. Roberts again had a predictably negative, bratty, "these guys suck" column, but the ultimate sin was what was not covered on the front page in order to make more space for more drawn-out negativity.

Today the Times had the opportunity to showcase two defining moments of the games: Apolo Ohno winning the 500m short track and being so thrilled and amazed at his victory that you could see the emotional release exploding from every square millimeter of his face. People in my house were crying when he won. He won after dumpster trucks full of pressure, most of it probably self-imposed, as NBC showed nightly videozines of the monastic lifestyle he adopted in the past two years preparing for his few races in these games. The Times recapped this hard-work-turned-success story on page 8 of the SportsSunday.

What's more, in reporting on the Ohno win, the Times decided it had to rehash details of the futility-of-everybody else story that had already been covered and covered and covered some more. In the Ohno story, the Times takes two big paragraphs to recount, again and in this order, Chad Hedrick's cluelessness, Shani Davis' decline of offer to skate in the relay, the futility of Bode, the primadonnaness of Johhny Weir, women's hockey's stumble to the Swedes, the grab-fall of Lindsey Jacobellis, and on and on. (Oh, they did have a picture of Ohno on the front page of the paper. It was next to an article headlined "Miller's Last Olympic Stumble..." and you get the rest.)

Just as good as Ohno's win, if not U-S-A enough, was Clara Hughes of Canada winning the women's 5000m skate. When she crossed the finish and saw her time, her face erupted in ecstatic disbelief, and then, because she left it all on the ice, she collapsed after half a victory lap out of emotional and physical exhaustion, breathing hard - or sobbing, or probably both - into the ice. The Times? Covered it in a tiny recap article on page 6.

Instead, the Times decided to continue to focus on the genX losers of downhill. What does the SportsSunday have on its front page today? Two entirely predictable stories and one completely random:

  • Headline mast by Serena Roberts with the headline "No Good-Conduct Medal for Ugly Americans"

    Thanks, Selena. Maybe if you had walked around a bit and found some other venues you could have found some positive stories. It's too bad these two weeks have been such a bust for you. And its too bad that, for two consistent weeks, you let your own expectations get in the way of your usually good columneering.
  • Only other above-the-fold story was about the goalie of Sweden's hockey team. (???)
  • Below the fold? Another predictable Harvey Araton column on Bode with the headline, "Did Not Finish? Miller Never Even Got Started"

Not who won, who did well, who did spectacular. Just another couple of stories, in a daily string of stories, about how poorly the downhill team did. And a pouty departure from the good stories so visible on TV. It was like the Times was at a different games. Yawn. Y-a-w-n. Y-aaaaa-wwww-nnnnn.

Comments

# 1 | Delicious Pundit | February 26, 2006 12:08 PM

The LA Times was no better. Something about this Olympics brought out the worst in these armchair moralizers who get free food. Good pictures, though, of Ohno's moment, and a great one of a Canadian woman speedskater winner, overcome, her maple leaf flag trailing behind her.

NHL FYI: The Swedish goalie is also the goalie for the New York Rangers, hence local angle.

# 2 | RPM | February 26, 2006 1:09 PM

The NY Times has the worst sports section of any major city newspaper I've ever seen. I'm not a New Yorker, but don't people usually get their sports news from the Post? The LA Times usually has good sports coverage, but it's very geared toward local teams.

# 3 | Dave S. | February 26, 2006 1:14 PM

I get most of my Olympics fix from watching CBC coverage (mainly live), but it is also interesting to look at the NBC taped coverage for comparison. I expected NBC to focus on the American hopefuls just as the CBC focused on our Canuck hopefuls, though NBC seemd to be more focussed.

One thing I watched on NBC was the Costas interview with Gretzky after the ignominous performance of Team Canada (mens) hockey. I think Gretzky may have been projecting his major dissappointment a tad on the country. Of course it was a surprise to see them go out with barely a whimper, but that loss was largely assuaged by a cluster of medals from other athletes garnered on the same day. Get a grip Wayne. Especially from our women, who ruled at these Olympics. Not just the women hockey players, but all our women.

My favourite moments from these games were Clara Hughes' win in the 5000 and Chandra Crawford belting out the anthem with unabashed pride after winning the cross-country ski sprint. Beats prima donna male athletes any day.

# 4 | Dave S. | February 26, 2006 1:21 PM

On the mens hockey loss, there's already jokes circulating....

Q: What do the Titanic and the Canadian mens Olympic hockey team have in commmon?

A: Both looked good until they hit the ice.

# 5 | Mike | February 26, 2006 3:55 PM

On the TV side, the only way I've been able to handle the coverage is to tape it all so I can fast forward through all the non-sports material (ads, background stories, etc) and the ice dancing. That way I can get through four hours in about 90 minutes or less.

The most annoying thing about the way NBC has covered the events is that, apart from the Americans, they usually only show the medal winners. The problem is that it sucks all the suspense out of the coverage since you know that just about any non-American they show is going to win a medal.

Having said that it seems that the coverage has been a little better than last time (more sport, less hype and back story) and the curling coverage has been excellent.

# 6 | Dave S. | February 26, 2006 4:25 PM

For those of you watching NBC you're seeing a taped interview with skaters Jamie Sale and David Peltier. While live the closing ceremonies feature Ricky Martin.

You've been warned! :)

# 7 | kevin | February 27, 2006 2:58 PM

RPM - my pref in my 5 yrs in NYC was the Times, but I'd guess that the average NY sports page reader edged towards the Post. But on the Post, I got sick of entirely speculative rumors presented as done deals, then later turning out to be unfounded rumors all along. And usually I find the NYT columnists to be better than the Post columnists. Although now that I think of it, Selena Roberts has often found reason to write negative, player-hating columns. As in, every time the US Open rolled around and she could slay the Williams sistahs again.

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting? (UPDATED)

Blogs in the Network

Top Five: Readers' Picks

Search All Blogs

Science News From:

Science News from NYTimes.com