District of Columbia https://www.scienceblogs.com/ en A Class of 51 https://www.scienceblogs.com/seed/2012/02/15/a-class-of-51 <span>A Class of 51</span> <div class="field field--name-body field--type-text-with-summary field--label-hidden field--item"><form mt:asset-id="18328" class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2012/02/your_states_report_card.php"><img align="left" src="http://scienceblogs.com/sample/repbuzz.jpg" class="inset" style="" /></a></form> <p>The Fordham Institute recently released their assessment of state science standards with a handy color-coded map—and California was the only state to receive a solid "A," along with the District of Columbia. On Pharyngula, PZ Myers wonders how his state will ever get into college with a lowly "C." He writes, "The Institute does a fairly thorough breakdown, so there are some bright spots: Minnesota is doing a good job in the life sciences, but where we got dinged hard was on the physical sciences, which are 'illogically organized' and contain factual errors." But at least Minnesota wasn't one of the twenty-seven states to get a "D" or an "F." Greg Laden repaints the Institute's map with only two colors, making a "Pass/Fail" version of the assessment. At first glance the blocks of red and blue look <i>electoral</i>, but much of the South is blue with passing grades, while Oregon and half of New England are red for failure. Obviously, the quality of education depends on complexities far exceeding geographical and political alignment. Greg Laden writes, "It is an interesting report to browse through, and you can get your PDF copy of it here for free! Also, have a look at this overview from the NCSE. How did your state do?" </p> <ul> <li><a href="http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2012/02/your_states_report_card.php">Your state's report card</a> on Pharyngula</li> <li><a href="http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2012/01/the_state_of_state_science_sta.php">The State of State Science Standards</a> on Greg Laden's Blog</li> <p><i>Posted to <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/">the homepage</a> on February 2, 2012.</i></p> </ul> </div> <span><a title="View user profile." href="/author/milhayser" lang="" about="/author/milhayser" typeof="schema:Person" property="schema:name" datatype="">milhayser</a></span> <span>Wed, 02/15/2012 - 04:52</span> <div class="field field--name-field-blog-tags field--type-entity-reference field--label-inline"> <div class="field--label">Tags</div> <div class="field--items"> <div class="field--item"><a href="/tag/district-columbia" hreflang="en">District of Columbia</a></div> <div class="field--item"><a href="/tag/education" hreflang="en">education</a></div> <div class="field--item"><a href="/tag/science-standards" hreflang="en">Science Standards</a></div> </div> </div> <section> <article data-comment-user-id="0" id="comment-1899876" class="js-comment comment-wrapper clearfix"> <mark class="hidden" data-comment-timestamp="1329353014"></mark> <div class="well"> <strong></strong> <div class="field field--name-comment-body field--type-text-long field--label-hidden field--item"><p>This is another example of judging outcomes by measuring inputs. California is doing a great job because they have the best standards??? When I see studies like this one published the first thing that comes to mind is how this activity was funded and how much it cost. Here is a partial answer</p> <p><a href="http://www.edexcellence.net/about-us/funding-and-finances.html">http://www.edexcellence.net/about-us/funding-and-finances.html</a></p> </div> <drupal-render-placeholder callback="comment.lazy_builders:renderLinks" arguments="0=1899876&amp;1=default&amp;2=en&amp;3=" token="Fq-OJhgfdFL7frM_Yfw-Tc0l-hIOoti39Wjj-193hQA"></drupal-render-placeholder> </div> <footer> <em>By <span lang="" typeof="schema:Person" property="schema:name" datatype="">Bob Sun (not verified)</span> on 15 Feb 2012 <a href="https://www.scienceblogs.com/taxonomy/term/17301/feed#comment-1899876">#permalink</a></em> <article typeof="schema:Person" about="/user/0"> <div class="field field--name-user-picture field--type-image field--label-hidden field--item"> <a href="/user/0" hreflang="und"><img src="/files/styles/thumbnail/public/default_images/icon-user.png?itok=yQw_eG_q" width="100" height="100" alt="User Image" typeof="foaf:Image" class="img-responsive" /> </a> </div> </article> </footer> </article> <article data-comment-user-id="0" id="comment-1899877" class="js-comment comment-wrapper clearfix"> <mark class="hidden" data-comment-timestamp="1329405122"></mark> <div class="well"> <strong></strong> <div class="field field--name-comment-body field--type-text-long field--label-hidden field--item"><p>Bob Sun makes a good point about judging outcomes by measuring inputs. (I don't think the Fordham Institute's funders are particularly relevant, though.) California may have great standards (according to the report) but does this matter if there is no support for implementation? </p> <p>Dear College Admissions Board,<br /> Please disregard my SAT scores and instead reference the California standards for math and language. As you will see, I was supposed to learn all of that stuff. So, you can rest assured that I am prepared to enter your school.<br /> Sincerely,<br /> Applicant</p> </div> <drupal-render-placeholder callback="comment.lazy_builders:renderLinks" arguments="0=1899877&amp;1=default&amp;2=en&amp;3=" token="XFB_QAgq7g5gCNZeRKTECRRKoLH3pI20ZqTCACQFE1g"></drupal-render-placeholder> </div> <footer> <em>By <span lang="" typeof="schema:Person" property="schema:name" datatype="">Jason (not verified)</span> on 16 Feb 2012 <a href="https://www.scienceblogs.com/taxonomy/term/17301/feed#comment-1899877">#permalink</a></em> <article typeof="schema:Person" about="/user/0"> <div class="field field--name-user-picture field--type-image field--label-hidden field--item"> <a href="/user/0" hreflang="und"><img src="/files/styles/thumbnail/public/default_images/icon-user.png?itok=yQw_eG_q" width="100" height="100" alt="User Image" typeof="foaf:Image" class="img-responsive" /> </a> </div> </article> </footer> </article> <article data-comment-user-id="0" id="comment-1899878" class="js-comment comment-wrapper clearfix"> <mark class="hidden" data-comment-timestamp="1329429822"></mark> <div class="well"> <strong></strong> <div class="field field--name-comment-body field--type-text-long field--label-hidden field--item"><p>@Jason<br /> My reason to list them was to reflect my personal curiosity as to who was conned into supporting this kind of stuff. I remain curious as to how much money they were able to extract.</p> </div> <drupal-render-placeholder callback="comment.lazy_builders:renderLinks" arguments="0=1899878&amp;1=default&amp;2=en&amp;3=" token="dtCIPEt7jSUs_qOqOveMmu1qIVpjp8jJXL14RxLIgfA"></drupal-render-placeholder> </div> <footer> <em>By <span lang="" typeof="schema:Person" property="schema:name" datatype="">Bob Sun (not verified)</span> on 16 Feb 2012 <a href="https://www.scienceblogs.com/taxonomy/term/17301/feed#comment-1899878">#permalink</a></em> <article typeof="schema:Person" about="/user/0"> <div class="field field--name-user-picture field--type-image field--label-hidden field--item"> <a href="/user/0" hreflang="und"><img src="/files/styles/thumbnail/public/default_images/icon-user.png?itok=yQw_eG_q" width="100" height="100" alt="User Image" typeof="foaf:Image" class="img-responsive" /> </a> </div> </article> </footer> </article> </section> <ul class="links inline list-inline"><li class="comment-forbidden"><a href="/user/login?destination=/seed/2012/02/15/a-class-of-51%23comment-form">Log in</a> to post comments</li></ul> Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:52:35 +0000 milhayser 69112 at https://www.scienceblogs.com