 |
Sometimes the success of a consumer intervention will create "blowback," and allow the industry to not only win but also demand other concessions. |
An excellent recent example of regulatory blowback came with the creation of the federal Do-Not-Call Registry. In creating the registry, the Federal Communications Commission also tried to tighten regulations on "junk faxes," unsolicited commercial fax messages. The FCC ruled that "junk fax" senders had to document that they had consent from recipients of their messages. The junk faxers organized into a huge coalition (the deceptively-named "Fax Ban Coalition"), lobbied Congress, reversed the FCC's rule and actually make it easier to send junk faxes by having deceptively-named "Junk Fax Protection Act" passed.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
I came across this statistic the other day while doing some research on marketing fraud:
In recent years, despite the creation of a national "do not call" registry, the legitimate telemarketing industry has grown, according to the Direct Marketing Association. Callers pitching insurance plans,…
The trick to using the "Jobs" card is to totally over inflate the size of your industry and the number of employees it has. It's quite a compelling argument, and sometimes it's true. But I've seen many cases where a regulation creates new jobs and economic development.
A great recent example…
Members of the public health community are aware of many of the ways the Trump administration and the 115th Congress are hindering and reversing evidence-based actions for public health – from an executive order requiring agencies to scrap two regulations each time they create a new one to…
You probably haven't been able to avoid seeing the televised bombs AT&T and Verizon have been throwing at each other over the maps of their coverage. Both sets of commercials (to differing degrees) fail to make it especially clear just what their maps mean to the consumer. For instance:…
Deceptively named "Junk Fax Protection Act"; why, that sounds almost dishonest.
Isn't it time for the blogosphere to take these political liars that do the bidding and identify them? This won't stop until they are associated with the deceptions that they perpetrate on the public.
Several months ago I read one of John Stossel's book. What surprised me (yes, I live under a rock) is that he was very anti-regulation. Time and time again he stated that capitalism would prevail, companies could police themselves (or consumers would), and that bureaucracies were evil.
There were a few points I agreed with him on (frivolous lawsuits), but for the most part I strongly disagreed. I'm reminded of that book every time I see one of your deck of cards post.
And there is a reason for that.
John Stossel is a libertarian nut (and not the nice kind of libertarian nut -- the socialist libertarian). Hope you got that book in the library and didn't actually pay for it.
It was a gift. I sold it this weekend at Half Price Books after making some notes in it about the content.
Junk Fax Protection Act sounds like truth in advertising, since it protects Junk Fax