Skip to main content
Advertisment
Home

Main navigation

  • Life Sciences
  • Physical Sciences
  • Environment
  • Social Sciences
  • Education
  • Policy
  • Medicine
  • Brain & Behavior
  • Technology
  • Free Thought
  1. appliedstatistics
  2. Recently at the Mother Blog

Recently at the Mother Blog

  • email
  • facebook
  • linkedin
  • X
  • reddit
  • print
User Image
By agelman on November 5, 2009.

Slipperiness of the term "risk aversion"

Med School Interview Questions

How to think about how to think about causality

Tags
Uncategorized

More like this

Advertisment

Donate

ScienceBlogs is where scientists communicate directly with the public. We are part of Science 2.0, a science education nonprofit operating under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Please make a tax-deductible donation if you value independent science communication, collaboration, participation, and open access.

You can also shop using Amazon Smile and though you pay nothing more we get a tiny something.

 

Science 2.0

  • Theory Of Mind Is Wrong About Autistic People
  • Bacteroides Fragilis May Be A Fifth Columnist Helping Colon Cancer In Your Body
  • What AI Can't Do: Humanity’s Last Exam

Science Codex

  • Communism V. Journalists: Beijing’s Crackdown on Press Freedom

More by this author

Bye
July 11, 2010
I realize that I haven't been posting much here. We had some plans to use the Applied Statistics blog for other purposes but it didn't really work out, so from now on you can go to my main blog for your statistical entertainment.
"How many zombies do you know?" Using indirect survey methods to measure alien attacks and outbreaks of the undead
July 1, 2010
I've been told that it's zombie day, so I thought I'd link to this research article by Gelman and Romero: The zombie menace has so far been studied only qualitatively or through the use of mathematical models without empirical content. We propose to use a new tool in survey research to allow…
Scientists can read your mind . . . as long as the're allowed to look at more than one place in your brain and then make a prediction after seeing what you actually did
June 23, 2010
Maggie Fox writes: Brain scans may be able to predict what you will do better than you can yourself . . . They found a way to interpret "real time" brain images to show whether people who viewed messages about using sunscreen would actually use sunscreen during the following week. The scans were…
Ethical and data-integrity problems in a study of mortality in Iraq
April 27, 2010
See discussion here. I've linked to it from here because ScienceBlogger and investigative journalist Tim Lambert has written some on the topic.
Random matrices in the news
April 12, 2010
Mark Buchanan wrote a cover article for the New Scientist on random matrices, a heretofore obscure area of probability theory that his headline writer characterizes as "the deep law that shapes our reality." It's interesting stuff, and he gets into some statistical applications at the end, so I'll…

More reads

Planning the perfect shot
Aphaenogaster woodland ants disperse a bloodroot seed. This image materialized in my head a couple months before I actually set it up. My photographs fall into two categories: incidental shots I happen upon by chance, and premeditated images mapped out in advance. There's not much to say about the first type. I wander about in the woods as another camera-toting tourist, and sometimes I get…
The New York Times "Pay to Click" Launches March 28
Source. The days of "free clicks" to access news media articles could be ending soon. But don't worry. Newspapers need to reinvent themselves for the new media and The New York Times will be launching a "newsonomics" model that makes sense - at least to a news junky like me. The Neiman Journalism Lab at Harvard University posted an intelligent analysis of how it will likely work, and could…
The Perils of Planet-Hopping
Watch me as I gravitate (hahahahaha). -Gorillaz Gravity -- unbelievably -- is the weakest force of all. But if you get enough mass together, gravity will overwhelm even the strongest outside influence. A simple case-in-point? You take a rock that's massive enough, and gravity will crush it into a spherical shape, like it was nothing more than a drop of water. And here we live on the surface of…

© 2006-2026 Science 2.0. All rights reserved. Privacy statement. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Science 2.0, a science media nonprofit operating under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Contributions are fully tax-deductible.