Skip to main content
Advertisment
Home

Main navigation

  • Life Sciences
  • Physical Sciences
  • Environment
  • Social Sciences
  • Education
  • Policy
  • Medicine
  • Brain & Behavior
  • Technology
  • Free Thought
  1. appliedstatistics
  2. Recently at the Mother Blog

Recently at the Mother Blog

  • email
  • facebook
  • linkedin
  • X
  • reddit
  • print
User Image
By agelman on November 5, 2009.

Slipperiness of the term "risk aversion"

Med School Interview Questions

How to think about how to think about causality

Tags
Uncategorized

More like this

Advertisment

Donate

ScienceBlogs is where scientists communicate directly with the public. We are part of Science 2.0, a science education nonprofit operating under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Please make a tax-deductible donation if you value independent science communication, collaboration, participation, and open access.

You can also shop using Amazon Smile and though you pay nothing more we get a tiny something.

 

Science 2.0

  • More Meat, Less Carbs, And No Raw Milk - The New Dietary Guidelines Are Better Than Expected
  • Misinformation Common Among Women With Breast Cancer
  • Even With Universal Health Care, Mothers Don't Go To Postnatal Check-Ups
  • Happy Twelfth Night - Or Divorce Day, Depending On How Your 2026 Is Going

Science Codex

More by this author

Bye
July 11, 2010
I realize that I haven't been posting much here. We had some plans to use the Applied Statistics blog for other purposes but it didn't really work out, so from now on you can go to my main blog for your statistical entertainment.
"How many zombies do you know?" Using indirect survey methods to measure alien attacks and outbreaks of the undead
July 1, 2010
I've been told that it's zombie day, so I thought I'd link to this research article by Gelman and Romero: The zombie menace has so far been studied only qualitatively or through the use of mathematical models without empirical content. We propose to use a new tool in survey research to allow…
Scientists can read your mind . . . as long as the're allowed to look at more than one place in your brain and then make a prediction after seeing what you actually did
June 23, 2010
Maggie Fox writes: Brain scans may be able to predict what you will do better than you can yourself . . . They found a way to interpret "real time" brain images to show whether people who viewed messages about using sunscreen would actually use sunscreen during the following week. The scans were…
Ethical and data-integrity problems in a study of mortality in Iraq
April 27, 2010
See discussion here. I've linked to it from here because ScienceBlogger and investigative journalist Tim Lambert has written some on the topic.
Random matrices in the news
April 12, 2010
Mark Buchanan wrote a cover article for the New Scientist on random matrices, a heretofore obscure area of probability theory that his headline writer characterizes as "the deep law that shapes our reality." It's interesting stuff, and he gets into some statistical applications at the end, so I'll…

More reads

Messier Monday: The Second Greatest Globular in Hercules, M92
"[T]he entire globe will soon be wrapped in a glowing envelope through which none of the magic of the Universe can be seen by the naked eye." -George Eslinger Welcome to still another Messier Monday here on Starts With A Bang! Each Monday, we highlight a different one of the 110 deep-sky objects that make up the Messier Catalogue, the first accurate catalogue of more than 100…
Can't we do something with this White House petition thing?
For a long time I ignored the White House petitions, mostly, because their sign in system was messing with me and I spend very little time on web sites that mess with me. But they seem to have fixed that problem and now I can actually read what is going on there and participate in the process. Or not. So, here's some ideas. First, I wonder if we should all sign the petitions for various…
The conspiracy circle is complete: Brian Hooker claims "The Man" has gotten to the "CDC whistleblower"
There is a disturbance in the antivaccine Force. I can sense it. Actually, it doesn’t take any special talent to detect this. You don't have to be some sort of pro-science Jedi. The evidence is everywhere. The most prominent examples of posts in the antivaccine crankosphere that tipped me off are on—of course!—the antivaccine propaganda blog Age of Autism, which references another blog’s post…

© 2006-2025 Science 2.0. All rights reserved. Privacy statement. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Science 2.0, a science media nonprofit operating under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Contributions are fully tax-deductible.