KITP: how neutron stars get their kicks

intense and dense afternoon as we get the current state of the art about neutron star natal kicks, theory and observational constraints



Chevy supernova
!

Vicky - on NS-NS constraints (video and podcast)

need >~ 2.1-2.3 solar mass He cores to get to iron and classic type II SNe
stable mass transfer may lower this limit
electron capture supernovae, in binaries, may limit on core masses right before SNe town to ~ 1.45 solar masses or more

evidence other than presence in globulars for subpopulation of neutron stars having low kick speeds: high mass x-ray binaries with e 0.2 and orbital periods > 30 days
- unlikely to have had strong tidal evolution, so the NS in these systems look like they have low SNe kicks, of maybe 50 km/sec - also infer maybe broad underlying progenitor mass range of 8-14 solar mass

there are other ways to get formation channels with low kicks - Fe core collapse but maybe with rapidly rotating cores, or low mass cores with stripped envelopes, or, what the heck, maybe it is the dratted magnetic field...

use the known NS-NS systems in the Milky Way, for which there is enough information - masses, spin orientation and system velocity
to constrain kicks on the second neutron star formed in these systems.

oh boy, biases when marginalizing 5-D probability distribution functions
there is a reason why these are not often discussed... read the paper!
bottom line, integrating PDFs by eye is not a robust process for typical astronomers...

so PSR0737-3039 may have had second NS through electron capture supernova with associated low velocity natal kick
1534 and 1913 are consistent with high kick Fe core collapse from higher mass core

Philip - wraps up from this morning on Electron Capture Supernovae and Black Hole kicks (video and podcast) and Natasha - binary population synthesis on globulars (video and podcast)

summarises why NS with natal kicks are retained is a problem, very nicely

get ~ 10% retention fraction with electron capture supernovae, for suitable range of binaries and mass ranges, at low Z, that go to ECS channel

cf Ivanova et al 2008

NB: ECS formed NS have lower gravitational mass, so expect 80-90% of NS in globulars to be relatively low mass ( 1.3 solar masses - but to see them spun up some mass may of course have been accreted)

Tags

More like this

new week, new topic - actually we'll be doing a lot of extragalactic globulars and the mass function of the clusters, but we start with Guido summarizing what we know about the stellar mass function within the clusters - including mass segregation and differential mass loss. Wheee.
New planet discovery by Bennett et al, about three Earth masses, adds to the variety of exoplanets. Prospects for lots of Earth mass planets being out there are improved.
While I was galavanting about the southland yesterday, the program moved on and John compared N-body and Monte Carlo (video and podcast)
When I was talking about balancing a stick, I mentioned the moment of inertia. Moment of inertia is different than mass, but I like to call it the "rotational mass". What does mass do?