Michael Maltz has sent me some comments on the severe problems data Lott used for his "More Guns, Less Crime" thesis. Note that this is a different set of problems to the coding errors that Lott has been dodging recently.
Also of interest is Lott's response to the severe problems---he ignored them and accused Maltz of fraud.
More like this
In his 6/9/03 posting, Lott claims that Donohue has made a "large number of easily identifiable mistakes".
Lott has an op-ed in the Kansas City Star which is recycled from a previous op-ed in the Columbus Dispatch that I commented on
Keiran Healy observes that the U Chicago Federalist Society acted with integrity when Lott libeled Donohue.
Brian Linse comments on Mark Kleiman's post and suggests that people should write to the University of Chicago