Via Ralph Luker I find Andrew Ackerman's correction of a Boston Globe article that downplayed Michael Bellesiles' misconduct. The Emory panel rightly found Bellesiles guilty of falsification and other academic misconduct. It is disgraceful that the American Enterprise Institute refuses to conduct a similar investigation into John Lott's conduct.
More like this
The Wall Street Journal has published an op-ed by Kimberley Strassel who writes about Bellesiles:
John Quiggin has a thoughtful post on the parallels between the Bellesiles and Lott affairs.
Benny Smith has replied to Andrew Ackerman's article that suggested that Benny Smith was really Michael Bellesiles.
John Lott and Michael Bellesiles are both mentioned in a new book, Historians in Trouble by Jon Wiener.