What makes a good physics program

This weekend I am off to a SPIN-UP (Strategic Programs for Innovations in Undergraduate Physics) meeting. The basic idea is for physics departments to meet and discuss how they can be better. Note: if you don't have a good acronym, you don't get any funding. In preparation for this meeting, I was thinking - what is the one thing I think could make a difference.

Maybe the most important thing is to create a community of learners. The department should be a place where students can be students. It would be awesome if this included space (in whatever form possible) for studying, learning, experimenting, socializing.

What about one thing I think that we (as a department) should NOT do? I think we should not "trick" students into becoming physics majors. Oh look, physics is fun. You will be awesome, you should be a physics major. No, students should study physics because they think it is awesome and they want to do it, even though they know it is difficult.

PS - Note about the meeting: In the off-chance case that you also are going to this meeting, tell me the promotional code "dot physics up" and I will buy you a beer (or non-alcoholic beverage of your choice).

Tags

More like this

It's not often that I find myself agreeing with the Incoherent Ponderer, but he's exactly right regarding Scientific American's
The big physics story of the day is bound to be this new report on American particle physics:
There's been lots of news from the AAS meeting in Seattle this week, but the best from my perspective is that high school physics enrollments have neevr been higher:
Sooooo beautiful. You must read what Pat has to say about APS's CSWP compiling a list of female-friendly physics departments. And follow the links therein.