Skip to main content
Advertisment
Home

Main navigation

  • Life Sciences
  • Physical Sciences
  • Environment
  • Social Sciences
  • Education
  • Policy
  • Medicine
  • Brain & Behavior
  • Technology
  • Free Thought
  1. bioephemera
  2. Gear necklace

Gear necklace

  • email
  • facebook
  • linkedin
  • X
  • reddit
  • print
User Image
By bioephemera on January 11, 2011.

i-9fcfc15d3b484e36637820493ac0abd2-gearnecklace.jpg

Wooden gear necklace, delicate industry

Tags
Conspicuous consumption
Retrotechnology and steampunk
Wearables

More like this

Advertisment

Donate

ScienceBlogs is where scientists communicate directly with the public. We are part of Science 2.0, a science education nonprofit operating under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Please make a tax-deductible donation if you value independent science communication, collaboration, participation, and open access.

You can also shop using Amazon Smile and though you pay nothing more we get a tiny something.

 

Science 2.0

  • Methanetetrol: We're In A 'Super Alcohol' Timeline Now
  • Extrasensorial Plot Premonition
  • Chronic Lyme Disease And Fibromyalgia: New Meta-Analysis Suggests Doctors Are Gaslighting Patients
  • To Go Where None Have Gone Before

Science Codex

More by this author

Goodbye to Scienceblogs
September 15, 2011
A few weeks ago, I was notified that if I wished to continue blogging at Scienceblogs/National Geographic, I'd have to agree to new terms. After considering these terms, as well as the decision to ban pseudonymous blogging, I don't feel that the new management and I are on the same page. I have…
SpaceChem!
September 14, 2011
A few months ago I got an email from Zachtronics, creators of the Codex of Alchemical Engineering, about the new indie game called SpaceChem. It was billed as "an obscenely addictive, design-based puzzle game about building machines and fighting monsters in the name of science." What's not to love…
Mechanical butterfly, circa 1911
September 14, 2011
Check out this great slideshow of fascinating advertising novelties from 1911, over at Scientific American.
Pseudonymity: Five Reasons the New Scienceblogs/NG Policy is Misguided
September 14, 2011
Recently, Scienceblogs/National Geographic decided it would no longer host pseudonymous science bloggers. As a result, many of my former colleagues have left. I think this decision was wrong. Read on for my reasons. One: simple fairness. Several well-established pseudonymous bloggers had been…
Seeing the invisible? There's an app for that
September 8, 2011
This video from Xperia Studio very effectively conveys how data visualization can both leverage and challenge our conceptions of "reality." The night sky we've seen since childhood, like everything else we see, is just a tiny slice of the spectrum - only what we can perceive with our limited…

More reads

How Far to the Stars?
"Mortal as I am, I know that I am born for a day. But when I follow at my pleasure the serried multitude of the stars in their circular course, my feet no longer touch the Earth." -Ptolemy When you look up at the stars in the night sky, perhaps the most striking thing that they do is rotate about either the North or South Pole, depending on which hemisphere you live in. But what do you get if…
The Friday Fermentable: Triangle Tweetup 2.0
If you follow me on Twitter (@abelpharmboy) or looked at this post Thursday, you'd know that I was going to a meetup of area Twitter users. I honestly had no idea what to expect and have to say that it was a rather enriching experience. It gave me a chance to press the flesh with a crowd very different and higher energy than some (but not all) scientific gatherings. The group was different…
Social Security is Toast
Mike the Mad Biologist links to a piece arguing that Social Security is fine thank you very much. Rumor to the contrary is pure political propaganda, and the fact that many young people think they'll never see a dime is a result of simple fearmongering. I am sorry to say that they're not right. They're not even wrong, having missed the point entirely. Indeed as a factual matter their…

© 2006-2024 Science 2.0. All rights reserved. Privacy statement. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Science 2.0, a science media nonprofit operating under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Contributions are fully tax-deductible.