Ideals

Bush may like to think he is non-abelian, but we know he has a nilpotent subgroup.

Not only does he have a nilpotent subset of ideals, but the interesection of his prime ideals is nilradical!

Phbt!

Tags

More like this

I originally had the impression the acts of Bush was willy-nilly - but you have convinced me I had it backwards; he is nil-willy.

By Torbjörn Larsson, OM (not verified) on 04 Jul 2007 #permalink

I have become convinced that Bush is actually a field. It is obvious he has no ideals.

Let p be a prime number, G a finite group, and |G| the order of G.

1. If p divides |G|, then G has a Sylow p-subgroup.

2. In a finite group, all the Sylow p-subgroups are conjugate for some fixed p.

3. The number of Sylow p-subgroups for a fixed p is congruent to 1 (mod p).

Why is this terrifying?

Because of all the (under Bush's command) Missile Sylows!

And the Missile Sylows in Russia, aimed at us, under Putin, whom Bush is going out of his way to antagonize, albeit finally bringing Daddy George H. W. Bush in to (literally) defuse things at the family compund in Kennebunkport.

Actually, Mobius, I think that means that he still can have ideals; it's just that they're trivial or improper.

I'm guessing that he's {0}, in which case his only ideal is himself.

By Brian Lacki (not verified) on 05 Jul 2007 #permalink