- Do not bring the University into Disrepute or through Inaction Allow the University to be Dissed
- Bring Funding to the University and do not let the Funding stop through Inaction, Except where such Funding would Conflict with the First Law
- Protect your Own Existence as long as Such Protection does not conflict with the First or Second Laws.
More like this
(AP)
href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/11/01/politics/main3441060.shtml?source=RSSattr=HOME_3441060">President
Bush compared Congress' Democratic leaders Thursday with
people who ignored the rise of Lenin and Hitler early in the last
There are two climate related rallies in Sydney tomorrow. The rally for climate inaction (What do we want? Inaction! When do want it?
I am very excited to report that the American Physiological Society in partnership with the The Physiological Society held a joint meeting from July 29-31 in Dublin, Ireland. The keynote lectures were given by Dr.
The Citi Global Perspectives and Solutions thingie, part of Citibank, has done a study that you can read here. It says that addressing global warming makes economic sense.
Hey, those sound kinda familiar... Come to think of it, replacing all university presidents, coaches, and athletes with robots is a really tempting idea.
IMO this implies an optimistically ordered set of priorities. These may be good advice to aspiring academics, but if I had to come up with three rules that universities operate by, they would be:
1. Make money, don't get caught, and definitely don't do anything that makes extra work for the Dean, Provost or Vice President.
2. You have the right to free speech, as long as you're not stupid enough to actually try it.
3. Making money trumps getting caught, if it isn't a felony.
"dumb enough"...
Stein: Now re-write Asimov's "Runaround" for an academic. Endlessly circling the funding pool?