Gun ownership by state

Ross Wilmoth writes:

Thanks for the stats Tim. Do you think that the reduction between the
1975 and 1989 surveys could be due to them being either side of the
registration legislation?

In 1975 it wasn't illegal to own a gun so long as you were licenced
(in states which had licencing) but in 1989 Victoria at least had
registration and so people with unregistered guns may have kept quiet
about it.

Of course those "few quiet ones" would be illegal but do you think
it's the reason for the difference?

Unlikely. Victoria has only about 1/4 of the population, so a change
there won't affect national figures that much. Nonetheless I will
pull out the state by state breakdowns and see what that tells us.

% gun ownership by state
     1975  1989
NSW  25.4    16
Vic  27.4    19
Qld  28.9    23
SA   26.5    23
WA   19.5    27
Tas  31.7    44

The 1989 survey was only of 2000 people, so the numbers, especially
for the smaller states are rather uncertain (e.g. for Tas the 95%
confidence interval is +-16)

The results seem rather ambiguous. NSW had the largest fall, and
while NSW did not have registration in 1989, Unsworth's attempt to
introduce it the previous year may have had some effect on the
reporting rate.

Tags

More like this

Greg Booth said: A 1976 study put guns in 40% of Canadian households. An Angus Reid poll in 1991 put the number at 23%. The 1989 International Crime Survey gave 29%
“If there are things you don’t like in the world you grew up in, make your own life different.” -Dave Thomas
You can check Suter's Graph 16 "International Homicide Rates Comparisons" against the source he claims for this data (World Health Statistics 1989). You will discover that the homicide rates for many countries have been grossly overstated (for example, East Germany is
I have only the vaguest memories of this myself, and that must be second hand. On December 6th 1989, I was probably in the jungle not getting much news. Anyway, Sciencewoman reminds us: