Denialists' Deck of Cards: The 2 of Spades, "Mere Inconvenience"

Are you practicing the "no problem" hand? You know how it goes--"there's no problem" (damn persnickety do gooders)! And even if people sometimes think that there is a problem, the problem that isn't a problem is caused by bad apples. But it really isn't even a problem.

i-73e8da0bce0cebef8eca34b7b2dc4657-2s.jpg It's just a mere inconvenience! Therefore, there's no problem! Remember this argument from the do-not-call debate on telemarketing? i-6c50acac1780b0bca2ca26938b76a298-3c.jpg

More like this

Now that we've gone through a very basic introduction to computational complexity, we're ready to take a high-level glimpse at some of the more interesting things that arise from it. The one that you'll hear about most often is "P vs NP", which is what I'm going to write about today.
Okay, you've tried denying that the problem exists, you've tried to trivialize the problem, and you've even argued that the problem causes so harm, so it isn't a problem. Obviously, this no harm thing begins to have diminishing returns. What's next?
Have you heard about InnoCentive? It's my new favorite website. The premise of the site is simple: "seekers" post their scientific problems and "solvers" try to solve them.