This week, the SEED kings are asking us:
"If you could shake the public and make them understand one scientific idea, what would it be?"
This is the first thing that comes to mind, and the scientific method is a good answer as well. I'm going to take a step back and say the public should understand what science is. That way they can tell the difference between this and science. From there, an understanding of evolution should come naturally.
Answers to last weeks question can be found here.
More like this
Michael Nielsen wrote another long thought-provoking essay (for his book, I guess):
Another commenter at Dembski's blog tries to answer my post about engineers and evolution. Here is the statement he quotes from me:
Goethe ... is a wonderful instance of the fact that the purest naïveté and the most mighty understanding can go hand in hand. -Thomas Mann on Goethe.
Over at Crooked Timber, Daniel picks up the Harry Collins thing I talked about last week, and asks an interesting questi