Skip to main content
Advertisment
Home

Main navigation

  • Life Sciences
  • Physical Sciences
  • Environment
  • Social Sciences
  • Education
  • Policy
  • Medicine
  • Brain & Behavior
  • Technology
  • Free Thought
  1. gregladen
  2. Do's and Don'ts Debating Creationists: Part 4

Do's and Don'ts Debating Creationists: Part 4

  • facebook
  • twitter
  • reddit
  • linkedin
  • email
  • print
Profile picture for user gregladen
By gregladen on October 5, 2010.
Tags
Uncategorized
  • Log in to post comments

More like this

One of these ads is fake, but I can't tell which one
It sounds like a whisper
Do's and Don'ts Debating Creationists: Part 3
Charles Darwin and God
Advertisment

Donate

ScienceBlogs is where scientists communicate directly with the public. We are part of Science 2.0, a science education nonprofit operating under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Please make a tax-deductible donation if you value independent science communication, collaboration, participation, and open access.

You can also shop using Amazon Smile and though you pay nothing more we get a tiny something.

 

Science 2.0

  • Forget Political Posturing, It's Hard To Warn People About Dangers Like Floods
  • Ohio State Endorses Probiotic Yogurt - Using Mouse Studies
  • UC Davis Epidemiologists Out To Scare New Mothers Again
  • Highlights From MODE And EUCAIF
  • The Right Of Return Is Complicated

Science Codex

More by this author

Last Post
October 30, 2017
This is my last post at Scienceblogs.com. In the future I will be blogging at Greg Laden's blog, located at its original home at gregladen.com. I have a feeling that Scienceblogs will not last long without me. What do you think? :) But seriously, I'll be talking about the story of the current…
Hacking Voting Machines
October 10, 2017
In every area of life, but especially in the overlapping realms of technology, science, and health, misunderstanding how things work can be widespread, and that misunderstanding can lead to problems. In the area of voting, the main problem seems to be the expenditure of great amounts of outrage and…
On that chilling law suit against the environmental groups
October 5, 2017
... which I've posted on before ... there are new developments, summarized at Inside Climate News: Invoking the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, or RICO, a federal conspiracy law devised to ensnare mobsters, the suit accuses the organizations, as well as several green campaigners…
One response to the Las Vegas Shooting
October 5, 2017
from a major non profit, click through the the X Blog to read the press release.
Watch Jeff Merkley Wipe Floor With Trump's William Wehrum
October 5, 2017
William Wehrum is a lawyer and once, apparently, worked for the EPA. Trump is trying to appoint him to be assistant administrator for air and radiation. This is a reasonably important job that concerns many aspects of the environment. Watch: https://twitter.com/SenJeffMerkley/status/…

More reads

Friday Cephalopod: They are the shadow
Reyner Onggara Compare!
Jason Dorsette: Maximizing collegiate success for African-American men
In the 18 years from my first faculty appointment, one of the most satisfying parts of the journey has been watching students come through my life who you can tell - you just "know" - are going to make a huge difference in the world. (I previously wrote of one of these here, Arizona clinical pharmacist, Sandra Leal, PharmD.) Well, two years ago, I was at the kickoff of a Juneteenth celebration at…
Faster-than-light travel: is it possible?
Apparently, this is becoming a good place for people to get their questions answered! My friend Brian, recently wanted to know what the possibilities were for faster-than-light travel. Specifically, he was interested in it because he wants humans to do it. Brian: but otherwise how will we ever have a civilization like that in Star Trek? Presumably, Brian's goal is to be able to travel nearly…

© 2006-2024 Science 2.0. All rights reserved. Privacy statement. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Science 2.0, a science media nonprofit operating under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Contributions are fully tax-deductible.