Skip to main content
Advertisment
Home

Main navigation

  • Life Sciences
  • Physical Sciences
  • Environment
  • Social Sciences
  • Education
  • Policy
  • Medicine
  • Brain & Behavior
  • Technology
  • Free Thought
  1. gregladen
  2. Edward Tenner: Unintended consequences

Edward Tenner: Unintended consequences

  • facebook
  • twitter
  • reddit
  • linkedin
  • email
  • print
Profile picture for user gregladen
By gregladen on September 7, 2011.
Tags
Uncategorized
  • Log in to post comments

More like this

Can we make things that make themselves?
Philip Zimbardo: The demise of guys?
Doodlers, unite!
Alex Steffen: The shareable future of cities
Advertisment

Donate

ScienceBlogs is where scientists communicate directly with the public. We are part of Science 2.0, a science education nonprofit operating under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Please make a tax-deductible donation if you value independent science communication, collaboration, participation, and open access.

You can also shop using Amazon Smile and though you pay nothing more we get a tiny something.

 

Science 2.0

  • Climate Entrepreneurship And IT
  • Social Media Savvy: Democrats Request Community Notes On Twitter Twice As Often?
  • Isoprene: Plants Can Make Their Own Pesticide But The Environmental Cost Is High
  • Marshall McLuhan Hated TV But He Might Like AI
  • Yelling Fascism Is The Fashion, But The Left Is Actually Less Diverse

Science Codex

More by this author

Last Post
October 30, 2017
This is my last post at Scienceblogs.com. In the future I will be blogging at Greg Laden's blog, located at its original home at gregladen.com. I have a feeling that Scienceblogs will not last long without me. What do you think? :) But seriously, I'll be talking about the story of the current…
Hacking Voting Machines
October 10, 2017
In every area of life, but especially in the overlapping realms of technology, science, and health, misunderstanding how things work can be widespread, and that misunderstanding can lead to problems. In the area of voting, the main problem seems to be the expenditure of great amounts of outrage and…
On that chilling law suit against the environmental groups
October 5, 2017
... which I've posted on before ... there are new developments, summarized at Inside Climate News: Invoking the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, or RICO, a federal conspiracy law devised to ensnare mobsters, the suit accuses the organizations, as well as several green campaigners…
One response to the Las Vegas Shooting
October 5, 2017
from a major non profit, click through the the X Blog to read the press release.
Watch Jeff Merkley Wipe Floor With Trump's William Wehrum
October 5, 2017
William Wehrum is a lawyer and once, apparently, worked for the EPA. Trump is trying to appoint him to be assistant administrator for air and radiation. This is a reasonably important job that concerns many aspects of the environment. Watch: https://twitter.com/SenJeffMerkley/status/…

More reads

Is my penis too small, too big, or just right?
You will now find this heady post at THIS LOCATION. Please click through!
The Antarctica Files: Whale whirls!
Writing grants + papers + stress + migraines + beautiful weather apparently = me not blogging. :-/ Luckily, others are and Dr. Dolittle at LifeLines put up a post on how whales use bubbles to hunt: Blowing Bubbles While that sounds like part of a Monty Python bit ("First you get the comfy chair... and then... BUBBLES! NO ONE EXPECTS THE BUBBLES!"), that is actually how whales hunt for fish, and…
153/366: Old School
Here in the US, we're slowly transitioning to the European system of chip-based credit cards (I got email at work saying that my new card there will actually be chip-and-PIN, wonder of wonders). This is not uniformly distributed yet, though, so about half of the retailers I deal with regularly want the chip, the other half want the old-school swipe. If you guess wrong about a particular store,…

© 2006-2024 Science 2.0. All rights reserved. Privacy statement. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Science 2.0, a science media nonprofit operating under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Contributions are fully tax-deductible.