Friday Wrap Up

It's almost quittin' time, but here are a few stories we felt got the short shrift among New Year's excitement, inaugurations, and such ...

On Wednesday, the Union of Concerned Scientists released "Smoke, Mirrors & Hot Air: How ExxonMobil Uses Big Tobacco's Tactics to "Manufacture Uncertainty" on Climate Change." Now, we're assuming this is not a jaw-dropping revelation to anyone out there, but we're looking forward to reading it and hope to report back on it. Check it out here

UCS has also recently released a periodic table of political interference in science. The color-coded "A to Z Guide" is arranged in four categories: The environment, public health, pollution and contamination, and national security. I find it to be a fun and user friendly primer for those who haven't been paying attention. Check it out.

Alas, science-conscious grandmothers will be sad to hear it, but Willard Scott uttered a misleading climate observation on Tuesday. Media Matters reports.

Finally, we don't know what shortsighted political party, multinational corporation, or media pundit was behind it, but Scientific American has corrected a longstanding -- and potentially hurtful -- scientific misconception.

Happy 2007, and have a great weekend.

Tags

More like this

The UCS explains in a new report (here's a news story from the UCS website, and here's the pdf of the report itself) that "ExxonMobil has adopted the tobacco industry's disinformation tactics, as well as some of the same organizations and personnel, to cloud the scientific understanding of climate…
For those whoâve been following the investigations into how the Bush Administration interfered with government climate science, the news about political interference into Interior Department science had a familiar ring. Chris Mooney sums it up well: âSubstitute for Philip Cooney an Interior…
At what point is the science certain enough on an issue? Is there a line of policy involvement that scientists shouldn't cross? What will the new Congress mean for science and scientists? These were some of the questions aired at science integrity-related events at the American Geophysical Union's…
In the Late Harper period of Canadian politics it's getting harder and harder to tell the difference between satire and legitimate news stories. Here's a couple of examples of satire followed by one that's even scarier and more disturbing because it's an actual news story. We live in interesting…