One more thing about yesterday's USA Today article

Something else is bothering me about yesterday's USA Today article Science vs. politics gets down and dirty. It's the implication that scientists are speaking out because of political bent.

Science policy professor Daniel Sarewitz of Arizona State University in Tempe says: "I think the opportunity to use science as a political tool against Bush has been irresistible -- but it is very dangerous for science, and for politics. You can expect to see similar accusations of the political use of science in the next regime." [...] And because polls show that scientists tend to be Democrats, Sarewitz says, their complaints should be viewed cautiously.

First off, assuming our next president is a Democrat, Sarewitz's observations would seem to contradict themselves. Aside from that, consider how Vergano closes the piece:

"The danger comes when (science) gets to be seen as simply politics by other means," (Harvard science historian Steven) Shapin says. "Why trust it then?"

Categories

More like this

Daniel Sarewitz, professor of science policy at Arizona State University, has an important op-ed at Slate today explaining why if we continue to frame the climate change debate in terms of science, we may never achieve meaningful policy action. Drawing on the conclusions of much of the scholarship…
This morning, hotel guests across the country this morning woke up to a chronicle of the divide between science and poltics in USA Today's "Science vs. politics gets down and dirty." There's no need to hit the complimentary continental breakfast for a second cup of coffee when your morning news…
Folks: Here's another old article I wrote that wasn't online. You could say this is the article that started it all...my 2001 report on how John Marburger had been marginalized in the Bush administration. We're talking old school....but at the same time, this kind of writing ultimately led to The…
"...tiresome polemic masquerading as a defense of scientific purity...." "The reader must therefore decide if the narrator is unreliable or just hopelessly naïve...." "Mooney's polemical fervor blinds him to the political content inherent in all discourse that connects science to human affairs…

This is great! The Mainstream Media⢠is now helping to promote a political "War on Science". I'm all in favor of this, of course, as I think it will be great for those of us with a scientific bent.

(Yes, this is a shameless plug for a blog post of my own on my poor, lonely little self-hosted blog...)