Dow Jones Industrial Average Falls Below 7,000

i-173b1b89dbd1ac8537d78b11906c702d-dow march.png

NEW YORK ( -- Stocks tumbled Monday, with the Dow and S&P 500 falling to 12-year lows after insurance company American International Group's huge quarterly loss added to worries about the financial sector and the economy.

The Dow Jones industrial average (INDU) lost almost 300 points, or 4.2% to end at 6763.29, its lowest point since April 25, 1997.

While I hoped this email from last September was hyperbole, today I'm less certain. The world has changed, but I remain hopeful that with the right direction, we may yet recover.

More like this

Some irreverent souls have taken to Sunday blogging on a freethinking themes.  I choose to Ozymandize* that which we worship the most: our economic system. That plant in the middle is href="">my mimosa ( href="http://…
This chart shows what the stock market had been doing since the summer of 2007, when the effects of the economic crisis were openly recognized by the Administration.  You can see that that various interventions have resulted in brief improvements, but nothing sustained.  The overall trend clearly…
Given the size of the kinds of Federal bail-outs being discussed these days, Harvard University's endowment, almost $37 billion, by far the largest of any university in the world, sounds like chump change. But it is a staggeringly large endowment for a university and the interest alone accounted…
I am wondering if the USA, as a whole, is more prosperous now that it was in 2000.   We are told that the GDP has gone up every year.  Population growth has been modest.  The published per-capita GDP has gone up, from $33,000 to $46,000 (as of 1 January 2008).  That seems positive... From CIA World…

May you be right. This country needs more optimists.

I have heard Roubini say that 5400 is the floor. Not that it will get that low, but that it is very unlikely to go below that.

P/Es for stocks are still too expensive by 70s standards.

Could go lower than 5400. But as Yogi says, "It's tough to make predictions, especially about the future." Eventually we have a recovery, then what? Don't forget that there is an energy crisis that is only temporarily on hold, which (to make a prediction) will come back with a vengeance during recovery. Nobody here seems to question that, beyond the proximal cause of the financial crisis, we are still dealing with a economic system based on growth that is ill-suited for a finite world. To that extent, Barack Obama and nearly everyone else is working within an unsustainable paradigm.

By Eric the Leaf (not verified) on 02 Mar 2009 #permalink

CBS Evening News on Saturday covered the economic situation at Toyota. It is not encouraging, and by the time the story aired, it made on mistake. At least one Toyota dealership in the San Francisco area has closed down.

I think that the observation of a Rockland, NY dealer is telling. He said that people are no longer coming in because they want a car, they only come in when they need one. That change from buying to you want to buying only what you need could last a generation. The last time it happened in America as just before I was born (1940). That lasted a lifetime for those who lived through the Great Depression.

If this is a similar bedrock change to Amercian Consumerism, the bottom of this market in not on anyone's charts and recovery may not be completed in Obama's presidency.

But, such a change may just save the planet from climate collapse.

I am certainly no economist, but looking at the position the economy is currently in I am not certain the people that call themselves economists are actually anything but very short sighted tea leaf readers. I suppose that's why it all seems rather simple to me - there has to be a radical change in the way we spend our money. We clearly rely too much on credit (myself included) for purchases we don't NEED (again, myself included, but I like to think less so now). Of course, the problem lies at the root of the system, a system built on ever increasing consumption of good by an ever increasing population. Throw a little profit incentive into that mix and you get rampant production, superfluous advertising, and a climate that blindly accepts both and we get where we are today. I can't see how that path can be sustained, and I hope that someone with some clout points it out so that we can get to the business of changing habits completely. Companies shouldn't be so much about making ever expanding profits as they should be about making solid products and taking care of their employees. Priorities should go to environmentally sound ideas and what's best for the common good, not what's going to make the most money.

Just don't put me in charge of it, because I have no idea how to make it all work.

By OneHandClapping (not verified) on 03 Mar 2009 #permalink