Health-Care Secret Revealed, Again: More Is Not Better

Some things you can't hear too many times.


stethoscopeIf there's any way out of our current health-care morass, it's this: In health care, more expensive care is often no better than less expensive care. We were reminded of this fact by a front-page story in this morning's WSJ, which points out that Pennsylvania is the rare state that requires hospitals to publicly report a wide range of data -- and those data show hospitals with good outcomes are often cheaper than hospitals with bad outcomes, even after you adjust for the patient mix.

Posted via web from David Dobbs's Somatic Marker

More like this

via blogs.wsj.com This is something we need to know. Let's hope we like the answer. Posted via web from David Dobbs's Somatic Marker
Ezra Klein thinks it might. "We're America," Max Baucus likes to say. "Which means we have to write a uniquely American solution." But the health-care solution that actually seems to be emerging in Congress -- which looks like the health-care solutions proposed by Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton…
The morning papers are filled with relevant health reform stories, but two stand out. They weren't reported by journalists, but were experience-based opinion pieces offered by people on the front lines of delivering and insuring health care. The first comes from the Washington Post, where a…
The last time a president won with 60 percent of the vote, for instance, was when Lyndon Johnson trounced Barry Goldwater in 1964. Health-care reform passed the House with only 50.5 percent of the body voting for it. And the senators making up this morning's 60 votes actually represent closer to…