Early global warming says VV at VV. It is an interesting idea; if you haven't read his post you should. The AR5 radiative forcing graph he includes is interesting too:
I hadn't realised the forcing had grown much more strongly after 1950.
More like this
Published on Nov 21, 2013
Back in 2013 I didn't take terribly seriously an announced review of the IPCC AR5 by a ctte of the UK parliament.
W00t, its the Big Fight, or at least its the spat du jour. Does anyone outside the little blogospheric circle care? My guess is no.
[RealClimate has a post with more useful detail.]
Am I missing something?
I thought the growth in forcing due to aerosols (global dimming?) was obvious. Michael Mann said so in one of his articles, the concern is the reduction in coal-fired power production might accelerate global warming in the short term.