Biology - it's all either math or engineering according to ID

Earlier on today, I noticed the following by Dembski:

If I ever became the president of a university (per impossibile), I would dissolve the biology department and divide the faculty with tenure that I couldn't get rid of into two new departments: those who know engineering and how it applies to biological systems would be assigned to the new "Department of Biological Engineering"; the rest, and that includes the evolutionists, would be consigned to the new "Department of Nature Appreciation" (didn't Darwin think of himself as a naturalist?).

PZ comments here. This is worth putting side by side with Berlinski's statement about the sciences:

My real view is that there is only one science, and that is mathematics, and that the physical sciences are really forms of experimental mathematics.

And they call evolutionists "reductionist"?

More like this

Following up on Saturday's entry on the bleak prospects for many UK archaeology departments, I'd like to share a remark made by a senior colleague a few years back.
Just another example of how cuts to health care funding simply shift the costs and endanger people’s health. This time it’s a study on the impact of eliminating adult dental coverage within the California Medicaid program.

There could be some merit it having a Dept. of Biological Engineering. After all an engineering approach should recognize the power of algorithms in explaining Darwinian evolution but some how I don't think that is what BillyBoy Dembski has in mind.

By CanuckRob (not verified) on 11 Jan 2007 #permalink

If Dembski ever became president of a legitimate university, it would be much better proof of God than all the rest of his drivel.

If Dembski ever became president of a legitimate university, it would be much better proof of God than all the rest of his drivel.

Hmmm. . .I think I would have a hard time believing in any God who could pontentially approve of Dembski's pathologically bad behavior.

Let's hope he ends up President of Bob Jones U then. I suspect that was what motivated the comment anyway - an attempt to get things rolling amongst his supporters.

I doubt that many of the guys at UD ever did some biological engineering especially genetic engineering. Otherwise DaveScot would have not written such BS about "the cost of mistakes".