American Cancer Society & AMA weigh in on OSHA silica rule

The American Cancer Society (ACS) and the American Medical Association (AMA) have offered their endorsement to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) regulatory efforts to reduce workers’ exposure to respirable silica. It’s a hazard that can cause the disabling lung disease silicosis, as well as lung cancer and other disorders. The ACS’s and AMA’s official statements of support are found in the agency's rulemaking for its proposed silica rule. The docket closed on Tuesday for this phase of the rulemaking process.

The AMA’s support comes in the form of a policy statement the group adopted late last year.  They supports OSHA’s proposal to establish a:

“stricter permissible exposure limit (PEL) for respirable crystalline silica…and a stricter standard of exposure assessment and medical surveillance requirements to identify adverse health effects in exposed populations of workers.”

The ACS, and its affiliate the Cancer Action Network's, letter of support explains:

“Although far too many lives have been lost to occupational cancer, countless others have been prevented through regulation and control of workplace carcinogens.  …OSHA presents a clear and compelling well-supported rationale for the proposed standard, and we urge that it be adopted promptly.”

And they concur with OSHA when it says:

“…common sense, inexpensive and effective control measures such as keeping the material wet so that dust doesn’t become airborne, and using a vacuum to collect dust at the point where it is created can be used to achieve adequate dust control in many settings at an affordable cost. OSHA’s analysis indicates that reducing the PEL results in benefits that substantially exceed costs.”

The ACS and AMA are not the only public health organizations that support OSHA’s effort to prevent workers from developing silica-related diseases. Others groups endorsing OSHA’s effort---or calling for greater protections for silica-exposed workers---include the American Public Health Association, the American Thoracic Society, the American College of Physicians, and Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists.

Next month, OSHA will begin a public hearing on its proposed silica rule. It is expected to last several weeks. Business groups like the Chamber of Commerce will testify that silica-related disease is a thing of the past, and that claims about silica’s carcinogenicity are erroneous. But with endorsements from these premiere public health organizations, OSHA should feel confident that it stands on solid ground.

More like this

Yep. “We’re not stupid” was just one of the many memorable moments at last week’s public hearing on OSHA’s proposed rule on respirable crystalline silica. The remark came from epidemiologist Robert Park of CDC’s National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH).  He was compelled to…
Freshman congressman Larry Bucshon (R-IN) scolded OSHA chief David Michaels for using the term "cancer" as a buzz word. The congressman, who is also a thoracic surgeon, said:"I don't like it when people use buzz words that try to get people's attention, and cancer is one of those." The exchanged…
This week will mark the next big step in efforts to institute a federal regulation to protect workers who are exposed to respirable crystalline silica. Tuesday, March 18 will be the first of 14 days of testimony and debate about a proposed silica rule which was released in September 2013 by the…
Two economists, funded by right-wing, university-housed think tanks, recently submitted their views on OSHA's proposed rule to protect silica-exposed workers. Michael L. Marlow with George Mason University’s Mercatus Center, and Susan Dudley of George Washington University’s Regulatory Studies…

This is welcome news. The AMA and ACS are not usually partners in this kind of thing, so it's noteworthy that they support the proposed silica rule. Let's hope it continues.

By Dick Clapp (not verified) on 15 Feb 2014 #permalink