Swedish Rules for Archaeological Finds


Linnea, one of the Salto sobrius regulars, asked two questions today on the Swedish archaeology mailing list that would be in my archaeology FAQ if I had one.

  • Who owns an archaeological find made by a member of the public?
  • Is it legal to sell archaeological finds?

Here's how things work in Sweden, which to my knowledge has the world's strongest legal protection for sites and finds.

The first thing to note is that all sites known to the National Heritage Board are protected. This protection isn't tiered like in England: to explain to you Brits, let's say that a Swedish site automatically becomes "Scheduled" the moment the Board receives information about its whereabouts. And a "site" can be anything from a single piece of knapped stone found in a field to a Medieval ruin.

To shock you Anglophones further, let me also emphasise that the landowner has very few rights with regard to the sites on his land. They sit on his property, but they are themselves in many ways property of the state. He can't dig them, he doesn't own any finds from them, he is forbidden to change his current agricultural methods on the sites for something more destructive. The important relationship when a find is made by a member of the public is between the authorities and the finder, not the landowner. Sweden has no trespassing laws.

A lover of archaeology and history will of course report anything she finds to the local museum simply for its information value, regardless of the legal situation. But let's look at the bare bones of the rules. Someone walks across a ploughed field or along the edge of a gravel pit and finds something old. What is required of them?

  1. If it's more than one object from one spot, then, regardless of what the finds are made of, the finder is obliged to report them and become eligible for a state finder's reward.
  2. If it's a single object, then the finder is obliged to report the find and become eligible for a state finder's reward only if the find is at least partly made of precious metals or copper alloy.
  3. The state finder's reward is at least the metal value plus one eighth, usually far more when collectible coins and jewellery are involved. Reporting a hoard find in Sweden is thus a pretty good business deal compared to selling it illicitly.
  4. This system works because metal detecting is only allowed with a special short-term permit that requires that the detectorist waives any right to remuneration.
So, is it legal to sell archaeological finds? Yes it is, within the rules mentioned above, and with the caveat that particularly fine pieces may only be sold within the country (as with furniture, art and other "national treasures").

If I find a single stone axe or iron spear head when I cross a ploughed field, then I am its owner and can do with it as I please. Sell it, donate it to a museum, carve it into the likeness of P.Z. Myers or blow it up with dynamite. What usually happens is in fact that people take their finds home and put them on the mantlepiece. Swedish farmers tend to have small collections of antiquities from their land, apparently as part of a constructed identity as custodians of that land.

If I inherit a collection of, say, flint débitage or heavy Migration Period gold jewellery from my grandfather, and no information about the find circumstances is publicly available, then I am its owner. Exactly this happened with a Viking Period silver hoard in Scania in the 1980s: it was found among the belongings of a deceased gentleman, and the heirs challenged the authorities to prove that the hoard had not been handed down from father to son in the family for 900 years...

I never buy archaeological finds, even to donate, as I don't want to contribute to a market demand. But I often ask farmers and antiques dealers if they have anything to show me, and given permission I take photographs and make descriptions for the museum archives. Looking at farm collections is actually the quickest way to get new Stone and Bronze Age data from an area. All you have to do, and this can be tricky, is convince people that you aren't going to take their stuff or report them to the police or sumfing. The dealers tell me that the Swedish urban collector of archaeological finds is pretty much extinct, except for coin collectors, who are a dying breed. Germans, however, are happy to pay good prices for Swedish finds.

Identifying archaeological finds isn't easy for the layperson. There are great stories about people using Migration Period neck rings to repair mopeds or close barnyard gates. I'm always happy to look at pictures of finds, of course assuming that it's not about getting an "expert opinion" to crank up the price of something you plan to sell. So, Dear Reader, if you find something funny, send me a pic and we'll talk about it on the blog.

The stone axe above is half a thin-butted one from the Early Neolithic, found during a rescue excavation in 1993 in Österhaninge parish south of Stockholm. I lifted the photograph by Jackie Taffinder from the excellent on-line catalogue of the Museum of National Antiquities, no 33747.

[More blog entries about , , ; .]

More like this

A friendly Englishman who recently settled in southern Sweden wrote me to ask how a law-abiding metal detectorist should go about getting a permit to pursue their hobby in this country. The first thing to understand is that the Swedish system makes it effectively impossible to metal detect on a…
As noted before here on Aard, last winter a man handed in a 2nd century Roman cavalry parade mask to the authorities on Gotland, an island province of Sweden in the Baltic Sea. He says it was found illicitly in the 1980s by a recently deceased metal detectorist. The old man in question was a known…
Chris O'Brien at Northstate Science has a great post comparing US and Swedish site protection rules, a response to my entry on who owns archaeological finds in Sweden. I'm definitely recruiting his entry for next week's Four Stone Hearth carnival. (To which all readers are invited to contribute.)…
Yesterday I began my return to the Bronze Age. For most of my career I've mainly worked with the Late Iron Age, a period that dominates the landscape of agrarian Sweden completely through its cemeteries and place names. But my first published piece of research, indeed the first research I ever did…

coin collectors, who are a dying breed.

We actually seem to have bred a new one at home recently. Henrik has been hoarding coins from all over for a while and always makes sure to get any strange foreign coins from geocaches we visit. On his birthday this week he got a coin album and has been happily sorting everything since then.

Technically, I'm a coin collector as well, at least to the extent that I still have the collection I put together many years ago (which only has Swedish coins in it, though). There are some old coins in it, the oldest from 1590 (which I happen to know, since Cecilia asked me yesterday when Henrik was tinkering with his collection). All the stuff I have, I have either found from loose change or (in the case of the few older coins) gotten from my grandfather. I've never been collecting to the extent that I've been buying stuff. I'm far from an active collector nowadays, but if I find good-looking coins among my change I put them away to someday check if I have them in my collection. Once a collector, never again quite a non-collector, I guess.

I beg to differ with your statement of strongest protection in the world:


Even a single spearhead belongs to the state, unless the state decides it does not want it.