Funding Envy, Not Physics Envy

Dave over at The World's Fair is asking a few questions about interdisciplinary envy. Do biologists wish they were physicists? Or do physicists dream of biology? And what about archaeologists?

1. What's your current scientific specialty?

I'm an archaeologist specialising in Scandinavian Prehistory, mainly the 1st Millennium AD.

2. Were you originally pursuing a different academic course?

Nope, I've concentrated on this subject since day one at the University of Stockholm back in 1990 when I was 18. I chose between archaeology and astronomy, but went for the field where I could dive straight into the source material without studying a lot of maths and physics first. Incidentally, the two fields that interested me (basically fantasy vs. science fiction, you know) are among the least practically useful ones known to humankind.

3. Do you happen to wish you were involved in another scientific field?

Yes and no. I wish I were involved in a well-funded field where there was a demand for my skills and knowledge. On the other hand, I also wish that Scandinavian prehistoric archaeology were such a field. Lovely discipline, crap labour market. But that, Dear Reader, you already know if you've followed my scribblings for any length of time.

[More blog entries about , ; .]

Categories

More like this

In the initial "Basic Concepts" post, I discussed the concept of Force in physics. This time out, I'll be talking about fields, which is a much dicier proposition.
So far we've seen that electric charges create electric fields. We've also seen that magnetic charges would create magnetic fields if there were any such things, but there aren't.
When we start looking at fields, there are a collection of properties that are interesting. The simplest one - and the one which explains the property of the nimbers that makes them so strange - is called the characteristic of the field. (In fact, the
To end this week, we wrap up electricity and magnetism with the fourth and final of Maxwell's equations. this one includes Maxwell's own personal contribution to these:

I'm happy as I had a successful grant application last week, however things aren't too great in the long term. Construction from the London Olympics has taken (apprently) money away from AHRC which funds a lot of Pleistocene work (from the archaeological side). Sigh.

Congrats, Steve! Let's hope the Olympic construction business leads to a lot of unintentionally interesting contract archaeology.

Paddy, thanks, I will be so thrilled to know that my job opportunities are on a distant planet... (-;