Best way to reduce animals in tox test and other thoughts

I'm waiting around for a meeting (about animal testing!) and thought I'd share a few things that I've been thinking about.

1) While we're not going to stop using animals for testing in a long time it is a good idea to reduce them where we can and where industry and the public (at-large; I know industry is the public, too) can agree one should strike when the iron is hot - even when the reasons are really different.

2) Will the use of this alternative method increase the number of animals later? If refined models don't provide adequate information or aren't accurate enough, you'll end up using more animals in the long run for re-tests when the deficiencies are brought up.

3) Want to know the best way to reduce animal use? Do the friggin tests right, with appropriate animal numbers the first time! Those who aren't toxicologists would be astonished how often this happens, especially on the environmental side. Some half-assed study shows equivical findings and everybody fights about it so more and more studies are done (most not fully complete either). At the end of 5-10 years of fighting, you've used way more animals than you would have if you conducted a bullet-proof study to begin with. So, animal rights people, if you really want to do the most good, work for stricter manditory standards for tox studies, especially on the environmental side of things.

Since it's Friday and I haven't posted anything in a while, here's your Friday aural pleasure:

Happy friday!

More like this

Remember earlier this week when we were discussing some of the positions people might hold with respect to the use of animals in research?
Today at the University of California at Los Angeles, a rally is planned to raise awareness about the value of responsible animal research and to denounce acts of terrorism toward animal researchers and their families.
Many of my ScienceBloglings have rightly called out animal rights terrorists who target researchers' children. They are absolutely right to do so.
Yesterday, as part of ongoing follow up on my story in this week's New York Times Magazine, I posted about

Hmmm....I have been wondering for awhile, just exactly how do they experiment on animals? Are there pictures and such?

Had to laugh at "do the friggin' tests right" - Sadly, the same thing goes for human drug trials in ALL phases!

By researchgirl (not verified) on 23 Apr 2008 #permalink