the 26th of January, 2007 at 8pm EST
is when Cycle 16(!) Hubble Space Telescope proposals are due
Hope you remembered to update your Astronomer Proposal Tools vs 16,
and you will want your new latex science justification templates
and remember to actually check what they say in the call for proposal itself
I think I'm on 4 this year, which is on the low side.
Mean success rate is around 1/8, which is not so good, eh?
More later, if I get time to chat.
More like this
Earlier this month, the long-awaited, three-year delayed OSHA silica proposal was published. It's a proposed regulation designed to protect workers employed
What is a fair non-science criterion for changing proposal funding priorities?
Despite a short 30-day comment period, dozens of interested individuals and organizations provided comments to Asst. Secretary Leon Sequeira about his proposed so-called risk assessment policy. I've pulled some of my favorite excerpts for your consideration:
Well, in that case I'm going to submit mine 8 times. It usually takes three just for me to find all the typos I put in.
Might work, you never know
Given the vagaries of the panels, 3 props with 3 different titles and subject areas might work well.
The only downside, experts will read it if you put the wrong keywords on the coversheet.