Chief Scientist in the State Department

Prof Nina Fedoroff is to become Chief Scientist at the State Department and science advisor to Condoleezza Rice

Good week for Nina, she got the National Medal for Science yesterday

Prof Fedoroff is a prominent biologist and an advocate of genetic engineering of plants and animals, in particular for food crops to improve yield and nutritional quality.

She is the author of Mendel in the Kitchen

A very interesting, shorter article on the issue appears in the current issue of Penn State Science Journal, here is a link to the online version

The most interesting point she makes is on how little people, including environmentalists opposing genetic engineering of food, know about the origin, history and conventional engineering of food, especially plants.
The article is fascinating and I recommend reading it. I have not read "Mendel in the Kitchen", it sounds interesting, as long as you avoid the rather irritating WSJ review...

Official PSU blurb on State Dept

Official PSU blurb on National Medal of Science

Fedoroff web site

Tags

More like this

The Penn State Alumni Association has produced trading cards featuring the best and the brightest of the university's faculty (Pa. trading cards highlight brains, not brawn).
The NYTimes Claudia Dreifus recently interviewed Dr. Nina V.
At a summit at the World Science Festival, panelists agreed that the U.S. is losing its stature as a leader in science.
There's something about the prefix "anti" that provokes all too many people, even some who consider themselves "skeptics," to clutch at their pearls and feel faint. Antivaccine? Oh, no, you can't say that! They're not "antivaccine"? Who could be so nutty as to be "antivaccine"?

Why are environmentalists "little people"?

They are not.
Look at how the clause is structured: it parses to "how little people know"
- "including environmentalists..."

ie Nina discusses how extensive genetic modification of food crops have been using traditional breeding methods and modern techniques like mutagens, as opposed to direct genetic engineering; and she discusses how poorly this is known, even among interested parties like environmentalists.