This
is an interesting exercise. Go to a site and state your
position are various issues that are major themes for next year's
Presidential election. Also rank the importance of each issue
to you.
When you do this, you are not seeing the names of any of the
candidates.
The site then shows you which candidate most closely matches you on the
issues.
I'm not saying that you should choose your vote based only upon logic,
but I suggest that you at least consider what would happen if you did.
Pick Your
Candidate.
More like this
NASA's Kepler mission has now been looking for transiting exoplanets for almost two years, and while we wait for the release of the next set of data and identified candidate exoplanets, they produced a very striking summary of what they got so far.
When either candidate wins a state, that candidate's supporters celebrate and underscore the significance of that win.
Last week, both PZ Myers and I posted about some anti-evolution candidates running for the school board out here in Hawaii.
Following up on Alice's excellent discussion-starter post on "
Let me guess. Kucinich and Gravel will be the leaders for most readers. [me, too]
An interesting idea, but for those of us who don't fall fairly neatly into a nice "liberal/conservative" dichotomy, this is pretty useless as anything other than a thought-proviking time-waster. And yes, I got Gravel and Kucinich - neither of whom I would consider voting for.
Manual Pingback
Me too - Kucinich and Gravel. Not my top choices.