Grammar and Cursing

Here's Vaughan on a neat grammatical shortcut:

Whilst drinking with a psycholinguist (say that after a few pints) I was taught a useful way of quickly working out the stressed syllable in any English word - something which is apparently called the 'fuck test'.

Simply insert the word 'fucking' into the word, as if you were using the swear word for emphasis, and the syllable that follows the 'fucking' is the stressed syllable.

For example, absolutely -> abso-fucking-lutely. The stressed syllable is the third: i.e. absolutely. It works for every multi-syllable word I've found so far.

On a related note, Steven Pinker aims for an explicit warning label in the latest TNR. I actually thought his chapter on cursing was one of the less illuminating chapters in The Stuff of Thought, which is, overall, a very illuminating book. Pinker spends fifty pages parsing the semantics of cursing, only to conclude that curse words are "connected to negative emotion". You don't say.

More like this

Inspired by this post, we've decided to devote a week to the analysis of studies from the history of psychology.
One of the first steps to learning a language is f
So I'm getting ready for a talk on science literacy and careers, etc, and was looking for material for some new slides. Anyway, I've always been a fan of delicious sounding science jargon, and have been on the hunt for an appropriate word I can use, possibly, as a thematic device in my talk.
A thousand curses on Kevin Drum for making me read some idiocy from the National Review's attempts to find thi

That's posi-bloody-tively brilliant.

My grandmother used to say that only the unintelligent swore because the intelligent could find a suitable alternative for expressing anger.

On a related note, my father says that his mother would have benefited from a loud "Aw Shit" every once in a while.

By amybuilds (not verified) on 11 Oct 2007 #permalink

Pronunciation != grammar.

Also: what other kind of linguist is there?

By Pierce R. Butler (not verified) on 11 Oct 2007 #permalink

The "fucking" rule is not quite that simple -- for instance, one can say either "unbe-fucking-lievable" (in accordance with the rule) or "un-fucking-believable" (which disagrees with the rule).

@Pierce: there are a lot of kinds of linguists, broadly defined by what aspect of language they study (phonology, syntax, semantics, discourse) and/or by what kinds of data they use (a text corpus like the web, collected speech, their own intuitions, experiments). The experimentalists, in general, are the ones known as "psycholinguists", although there are other institutional/cultural/social factors that go into that kind of self-identification.