Who is the next great science communicator?

This post was co-authored with Eric Berger, science writer at The Houston Chronicle.

It's been nearly two decades since Carl Sagan, the great science communicator, died.

Since that time public trust in science has eroded, and no one has emerged as Sagan's clear successor. At the same time popular culture is littered with faux science ideas, from anti-vaccination fervor to documentaries on mermaids and mega-sharks.

What the world needs, then, is a great communicator of science who can connect with large audiences, liberal, moderate and conservative, to help explain what science is, and the wonders it reveals about nature and the nature of the universe.

So do we have one? We have compiled a list of science communicators who have both a large reach and shown a desire to engage with the public on these issues. Now we'd like to gather public input on who is both most effective, and most widely known.

To that end, we'd like you to take our poll, shown below.

Do you hate the list above?

We caught some grief on Twitter Saturday when the poll was first published. Too few females. Too many glaring omissions. The list was too tilted toward North America. The list was too arbitrary. And so on.

What I can say is that the poll is intended to stimulate discussion and thought about the topic. It was not intended to be a rigorous academic exercise. With that being said, I would stand by the science communicators we have chosen for our poll as the best and most widely known science communicators. There are a lot of wonderful science bloggers and authors who have devoted audiences, but if their reach is, say, 10,000 people then they are hardly making a deep impression on the public consciousness.

Which at the end of the day is what the next Carl Sagan should do.

A version of this post appeared at SciGuy, a blog at The Houston Chronicle.

More like this

Forget about framing for a second. What about the messengers? Speaking to the BBC's World Service, Jim Hansen bemoans the dearth of good science communicators. Given the context of the interview, I think he's referring specifically to climate science communicators. The entire interview is online,…
Despite the fact that the producers of Expelled! have the most nefarious of motives in mind, and that we can expect more from them (we are waiting for the other shoe to drop), it is interesting to note how many conversations this documentary about Intelligent Design Creationism has sparked.…
I was just surfing the great science blog of Eric Berger, who writes for the Houston Chronicle, when I found a post with this title: "The forecast for Houston, a century hence." You see, Berger has gone and done a big story about how global warming will affect Houston--and what Houstonians can…
As if things weren't contentious enough around here already, I've got another subject for general discussion that I'm sure will lead to some debate. In science there has long been a tradition of trying to engage the public, whether it be through public debates/lectures, books, etc. As Stephen Jay…

I have to be honest i don't really know anything about those "science communicators". To me science communicators are Lawrence Krauss and Richard Dawkins as well as a few others, but none of the list above.

I frequently try to share quotes of Dr. Tyson, and it stuns me how few people have even heard of him.

By Wayne Ruffner (not verified) on 13 Aug 2013 #permalink

Michio Kaku and Neil deGrasse Tyson are both awesome. The former I've read most of his books and the latter know mostly through video clips.

I'll go for a wildcard and say Cormac McCarthy. His literature and work with the Santa Fe Institute (and Lawrence Krauss) has made a huge impact on me. I'd also say someone like Bill Gates who is heavily involved in science and technology as a key to combating humanitarian problems.