Here's a wonderful clip of Nancy Knowlton discussing her coral research in the tropics. Nancy is one of the world's premier marine biologist with an accomplished scientific career. Courtesy of Scripps Oceanography, UC San Diego, "Endangered Oceans" Explorations DVD, Volume 10 No. 3
More like this
Al Gore addresses the Netroots Nation:
Nancy Pelosi, and more, below the fold.
I was just on my way to Raleigh this morning, among other errands also heading to Quail Ridge Books to pick up a book there, when I heard
Another year, another Breast Cancer Awareness Month.
I have to draw the line somewhere.
The dish in front of me is grey and shiny.
"Russian dog," says my waitress Nancy.
"Big dog," I reply.
Woo! Nice science! When the narrator said all the stuff they measure I asked myself "how the heck do they measure stuff like that?" then it was described... I like the way they measure the distance the bundles travel using buoyant light sticks, it's like an extremely silent underwater rave party.
How do you measure the error and uncertainty in this kind of measurements? It looks like a light stick can travel less distance than those sperm and eggs bundles because of its shape, it'll have greater resistance to the currents. Or maybe it's the other way around?
Thank you.
The light stick won't travel any faster than the eggs or sperm bundles. Because it is not actively be propelled, it will travel at the same speed as anything else that is floating in water, even coconuts!
But! but... well, I guess it's like the rock and feather experiment on top of The Tower of Pizza... is it?
Not exactly, the light stick, coconuts and other flotsam don't sink. Rocks would sink while the feather floats. The density of the former objects is less than that of water so its floats. In some not-so-obvious objects, i.e. the coconut, the object has enough gases or airspace in it that it counters the effect of its own density and stays afloat.