I haven't tried to solve this yet, but considering the headline I feel honor-bound to give it a try. It's a pity it wasn't available in time to include in the Big Sudoku Book, since we have a section discussing how the difficulty of a puzzle is determined.
More like this
Robert Redford's new movie Lions for Lambs is struggling at the box office. It's also been getting largely negative reviews. But since I saw Bill O'Reilly and other right-wing outlets bashing it for its supposed anti-American bias, I felt honor-bound to go see it.
But if you don't, here are some snippets from his recent posts:
What's missing from the Democratic convention?:
Brittany Maynard died this weekend. If you are not familiar with her story, she tells it here, in her own words.
Almost exactly a year ago, I came across a bit of woo so incredible, so spectacularly stupid and unbelievable, that I dedicated one of the last segments I've done in a long time of Your Friday Dose of Woo
Cracked it in about 6 hrs. Identified that the lower-right box(region) had 14 possible solutions. Tried them one-by-one. The correct one led me to try one of five possible row-7 solutions. One of those led me to one of three possible column-8 solutions. One of those led to one of two top-left box solutions. And voila!!!
When you say you tried the 14 possible solutions from the lower right box, how did you do that? Because its easy to come to the 14 solutions (I came to that part) but after every solution you still have work to do and you cant get any numbers for sure and yet have to break it down to more possible solutions which takes a very long time (trying all 14 possibilities and their ''sub-possibilities'')
there are two "1"s in a row. How can that be correct??
Diagonally, bottom left corner to top right corner
Erik --
In Sudoku, the two long diagonals are not considered to be regions in which every number from 1 to 9 must appear exactly once. Only the horizontal rows, vertical columns, or 3 by 3 blocks have that restriction. So there is no problem having two ones on the same long diagonal.
There is another type of puzzle called Sudoku X, in which the two diagonals are considered to be restricted regions. But that is a different kind of puzzle.
I shared this post on Facebook and was advised that this isn't a valid sudoku puzzle on account of having less than 22 numbers given and therefore more than one valid solution.
Is this the case?
Many valid 17-clue puzzles are known; here are fifty of them, with a link to a list of 49151 more:
http://mapleta.maths.uwa.edu.au/~gordon/sudokumin.php
Thanks, David!
Take this hardest puzzle, then scan it into photoshop and reversei it, so it's a mirror image. It becomes a very different puzzle.
I do research on mental rotation skills, and we've been using Mirror Readoku puzzles as stimuli. Fascinating findings.
Search: Mirror Read for free puzzle.
Do you mean that it becomes harder because the symbols are no longer instantly recognizable?
Via Slashdot, here's a good article on determining the difficulty of a Sudoku puzzle:
http://www.i-programmer.info/news/181-algorithms/4598-the-chaos-within-…
Another article on the same site is about a proof by exhaustive search that there are no 16-clue puzzles:
http://www.i-programmer.info/news/181-algorithms/3572-no-16-clue-sudoku…