Wiley's at it again

By evolvingthoughts on October 25, 2006.

Donate

ScienceBlogs is where scientists communicate directly with the public. We are part of Science 2.0, a science education nonprofit operating under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Please make a tax-deductible donation if you value independent science communication, collaboration, participation, and open access.

You can also shop using Amazon Smile and though you pay nothing more we get a tiny something.

Science 2.0

Science Codex

More by this author

My new blog

August 7, 2009

For those who come here from old links, my new blog address is evolvingthoughts.net This blog is no longer active.

Evolving Thoughts moves

May 23, 2009

So it is farewell... I have enjoyed blogging here at Seed, who have been generally very good to me given the constraints of herding cats with string they are working under, but it is time to move on. The neighborhood became a little hostile to old fashioned fogies like me, and that's all we need to…

We will resume transmission as soon as we can

May 20, 2009

There's some reorganising of my life and blogging going on. I'll announce all the changes to links and stuff in a fortnight or less. Please excuse the dust and noise of the construction behind the plastic sheets.

No, it's not an ancestor either (probably)

May 19, 2009

In addition to the "missing link" trope that is being dished out about the new primate fossil, is another one, more subtle and insidious: it's the ancestor of all primates. How do they know that? Consider a biologically realistic scenario: at the time there were probably hundreds of species of…

Alpha Fail

May 18, 2009

More like this

Oh yeah...

Neither does "diairesis"

Science is a metaphysical party pooper

Why bonobos will never get their own prime time TV show

My new blog

Evolving Thoughts moves

We will resume transmission as soon as we can

No, it's not an ancestor either (probably)

Alpha Fail

Messier Monday: The Farthest Messier Spiral, M109

Dark Energy, Dark Flow, and can we explain it away?

In which pro-vaccine advocates are inappropriately portrayed as frenzied, self-righteous "zealots"