Oh. No. Right. Bob Bar. Not Barbar. Whatever.
Did this guy know this was a comedy show before he went on?
[Hat tip: knee-jerk reactionary libertarian homeschooler "Bore me to tears"]
More like this
Massimo Pigliucci has a post up that is partly about the issue of realism vs. anti-realism in the philosophy of science. He describes the issue as follows:
Blake Stacey has taken the first step towards becoming another Mike Godwin or Bruce Salem*: Blake's Law has a Wikipedia page.
How difficult is it to distinguish between knee-jerk criticisms of religions and well-reasoned arguments? I would personally state this is quite simple by looking at the premises of the argument, but this oversimplifies a very complex issue....
Lots of you have noticed that the ERV blog is currently inaccessible.
Not that there's anything wrong with that...
Wow, I was just about to blog that. Now I don't have to!
Sure you do.
Virgil, where's your blog? You could make Greg's life easier if he could just link to you.
I don't have my own blog. I got that one off Ed Brayton's blog, using my time machine. Laden could post it before Brayton, and make it look like Brayton stole the idea from him.
Thanks for the link :)
Um...its Bob Barr.