The heretofore unknown events that led to an investigation of Dr. Marc Hauser of Harvard University, which led to a recently completed investigation of Hauser's scientific conduct.
You cann read the article here. I hope you can access that document (it may be fully or partly behind a firewall). At the moment, I'm out in the middle of the forest so I can't summarize it for you, but let me know if it is not generally viewable and I'll rectify that later assuming I am not eaten by bears.
More like this
Maybe I was wrong.
Remember Daniel Hauser, the child who was busy dying of cancer while his parents kept real doctors away and treated him with homeowooatherapy and stuff? The Hauser family would now like everyone to go away again.
Over the last couple of weeks, I've been blogging regularly about the case of Daniel Hauser, the 13-year-old boy with stage 2B Hodgkin's lymphoma who, after one course of chemotherapy in January, refused to undergo any more,
I've been writing a lot about the case of Daniel Hauser, the 13-year-old boy with Hodgkin's lymphoma who underwent one course of chemotherapy and then decided he wanted to pursue "alternative therapy" based on
I can access it from home just fine. Interesting read.
Hope the bears stay away - don't forget to stroll through the forest will clapping two pieces of wood together - I hear that keeps them away. (Yes, just kidding)
By the way, you're not near these bears are you?
Ten or more black bears found guarding B.C. pot farm
Indeed, it's not behind a paywall, I could read it just fine as well. If true, this is starting to look pretty bad for Hauser.
Indeed; if the allegations can be supported, it does not look good.
If true, Hauser's described actions seem quite heavy-handed and not the least bit subtle. Is that just his personality, or due to being so invested in the research, or something else?
I'm very surprised that the coding of the monkey's responses to sounds was apparently done by viewing the recording with the sound on, and by the person who cared most about the outcome. This is definitely bad science.
Indeed, regardless of anything else the article makes it sound like the experiments weren't double blinded when it wouldn't have been hard to do so. Pretty sloppy if true.
Wow! A protocol that did not have AUDIO OFF for the coder should have been rejected.