SpaceX CEO & CTO Elon Musk discusses the difficulty of making a reusable rocket. Filmed at The National Press Club.
More like this
Meet CTO of Host Sponsor Lockheed Martin interviewed by Engineering.com at the 2010 USA Science and Engineering Festival.
Why do you think getting American's excited about science is important? What do you think we can do about it? What about science do you find exciting?
Check out this great video of Ray O Johnson the CTO of our host sponsor, Lockheed Martin, being interviewed by Forbes Editor of the monthly Forbes/Wolfe Emerging Tech Report and Nifty Fifty speaker Josh Wolfe.
Happy Saturday. Here are some links. Science:
The New York Botanical Gardens Today: A Photo Diary
Federal agents this morning are searching the Judiciary Square office of Washington, D.C.'s Chief Technology Officer.
The search is part of "an ongoing investigation," said a spokeswoman for the FBI's D.C. Field Office, Lindsay Gotwin, said. She declined to comment further.
SpaceX is my favorite example of how stupid the whole "privatization" idea is. The Soviet Union announced the successful lauch of Sputnik on 4 October 1957. Eisenhower announced a crash program and the USA put Explorer I in orbit (and discovered the Van Allen belts) on 31 January 1958!
SpaceX has been at it for nine years, with the aid of *50 years* of materials research, computers, etc. *and* the full cooperation of NASA. The results of SpaceX have been, to put it politely, modest.
As an offshoot of the Sputnik debacle, the U.S. Government launched "The Eisenhower Mathematics And Science Education Program" of which I --and I suspect Greg and many of the older readers here-- are the direct beneficiaries.
SpaceX is a joke.
--bks
Commenter bks seems to be unaware of the facts that the US had repeatedly failed to get a three-lb. satellite into orbit before finally succeeding with the 30-lb. Explorer I, and that that effort began in 1955, not after Sputnik.
bks should check out the failure rates of early launches, and even the failure rates of modern missions with larger payloads.
If getting into space were easy, everyone would be doing it. SpaceX has done amazing work in a short time, and has gone a long way towards its goal of being the most economical way to get heavy payloads to space.
Mark, I stand by what I wrote. Project Orbiter was proposed in 1954,
killed in 1955 *and revived as a crash program* when the Sputnik was launched. The Wikipedia article is okay on this timeline:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Explorer_1
And that was over fifty years ago! SpaceX is quite unremarkable in its accomplishments. SpaceX gets funding, facilities and support from NASA. SpaceX is just the nosecone of a Saturn V public effort.
--bks