The family of the Amish girl with cancer who needs chemotherapy flee the country and claim natural healing has "cured" her

A couple of weeks ago, I commented on the story of 10 year old Amish girl in northeast Ohio with cancer whose parents, alarmed by the side effects of chemotherapy, had decided to stop the chemotherapy and treat their daughter with folk medicine instead. As a result, alarmed at the likelihood that Sarah Hershberger would suffer and die unnecessarily at a young age, the hospital treating her, Akron Children's Hospital, went to court. It lost the first round, but earlier this month the original ruling was overturned, and it was ordered that Hershberger undergo chemotherapy to save her life. The odds of her survival with chemotherapy were estimated to be on the order of 85%. Her odds without chemotherapy? About as close to zero as you can imagine.

One of the most disturbing things about this case is the reaction of so many people to it. It was not what you might hope. In reality, the predominant reaction was outrage that the state would so usurp parental rights. Indeed, if you go to the hospital's Facebook page, you'll see that there are still people ranting over it, with posts like this:

I won't EVER EVER EVER step foot in Akron Children's Hospital EVER EVER EVER again. My children will NEVER go there after what you've done to this family.

You should all be ashamed of yourselves. You want people to vote on something in November? I can tell you that I won't be voting for anything for your hospital. Was it worth it? Putting this family through all of this? Was it WORTH IT? You've ruined your public image. You've ruined the confidence of parents trusting you and bringing their children to your doctors and hospital. I can tell you that I am not the only person who feels this way about your hospital now. People are scared to death to bring their children to you now. People talk and they don't trust your hospital any more. It's your own damn fault. http://journal.livingfood.us/2013/10/27/amish-girl-being-forced-into-ex…

There was a lot more of this on the Facebook page a couple of weeks ago, all with generally the same hysterical tone. There were post after post after post by people claiming all sorts of evil intent on the part of the hospital, accusing it of "poisoning" the girl, and all sorts of other nastiness. What caught my interest, though, was the article cited in the mini-rant above, entitled Amish Girl Being Forced into Experimental Chemotherapy Taken Out of US and Recovers with Natural Treatment.

That's right. Sadly, but not entirely unexpectedly, the Hershbergers have apparently taken their daughter out of the country to avoid chemotherapy. The longer they do that, the more likely it is that their daughter will die a horrible death, and it will be her father Andy Hershberger's fault. I realize that he has nothing but the best intentions and believes he is doing the best thing for his daughter, but he is wrong, so very wrong. If his decision is not reversed, his daughter will almost certainly pay a very unpleasant price.

As an aside, let me just make a brief mention of the first thing I thought of when I saw the name of the author, David Michael. Way back in the day, when I first discovered Holocaust denial and cut my teeth on combatting online Holocaust deniers, one of the deniers I tangled with the most often was named David Michael. He's the guy I mentioned back in 2005 who gloated over the 9/11 attacks, calling the attack a "truly wondrous thing" and the day a "glorious day." No, this David Michael is not that David Michael. For one thing, that David Michael is British, and this David Michael lives in northeast Ohio and writes for a website called the Journal of Natural Food and Health. He's also very obviously antivaccine and pro-quackery. I only mention this because it's a weird coincidence, and it's hard for me to stop thinking about it. In any case, let's take a look at what he claims:

Early in October 2013, the entire nation heard about how Sarah Hershberger, a 10-year old Ohio Amish girl with leukemia (now recovered), is being forced into a two-year unproven experimental chemotherapy study by Akron Children’s Hospital (ACH). It was just learned the parents, Andy and Anna Hershberger, took their significantly recovered daughter out of the United States before the court ruled that a hospital-affiliated, attorney-nurse, Maria Schimer, was made the medical guardian to make sure Sarah will get her treatments. Parents reported this week the child is fully recovered through natural treatments. Schimer is General Counsel (chief legal advisor) for Northeast Ohio Medical University (NEOMED), a close affiliate and business partner of the hospital. According to Andy, Ms. Schimer has never met Sarah or him and his wife and they were never told their child was being used in a research study—among other things.

Although they do not know it yet, the hospital now has a big problem they must deal with. Sarah is completely recovered, as of October 23, according to Andy. The hospital told them and the news media that Sarah would die in a few months without the treatment they recommend. Three doctors that have treated her with a natural, biochemical protocol using nutrition, supplements and plant extracts have declared Sarah cancer free based on cat scans and blood tests—confirmed three times.

Well, this is mighty convenient. Nothing fishy here, right? Now that court has ruled that Sarah Hershberger has to undergo conventional treatment, suddenly the father claims that Sarah is cancer-free, thanks to the quackery to which he subjected her. The three doctors who allegedly treated her with "natural therapies" are not identified, and no evidence that Sarah Hershberger is, in fact, cancer-free is presented. All of this puts the hospital at a profound disadvantage, because it can't comment on Sarah Hershberger's case because of patient confidentiality laws. In contrast, Andy Hershberger can say whatever he wants and doesn't have to produce any actual evidence. I'd love to know the names of the three doctors to see what sorts of treatments they recommend for cancer and what sorts of tests they order to determine if someone is "cancer-free." Let's just put it this way. David Michael won't take the hospital's word for it that Sarah Hershberger will die without chemotherapy. I won't take his or Andy Hershberger's word for it that Sarah is cancer-free. Let me just challenge Mr. Michael: Identify the three doctors who allegedly treated Sarah Hershberger with "a natural, biochemical protocol using nutrition, supplements and plant extracts." Let us know what the protocol is.

That isn't to say that I think Mr. Hershberger is lying. He is almost certainly telling the truth as he sees it, but he also clearly grossly misunderstands cancer treatments, specifically why pediatric oncologists do what they do. Unfortunately, quack apologists are taking advantage of Mr. Hershberger's ignorance about cancer, an ignorance shared by most people. Most likely what happened is that the chemotherapy shrank Sarah's tumors to the point where they are no longer detectable on CT scans. This is a common initial outcome after early rounds of chemotherapy. The problem with lymphoma is that, although it is fairly easy to put lymphoma into an apparent complete remission, making that remission permanent is difficult. It takes a lot more than just a round or two of chemotherapy, a lesson learned painfully by pediatric oncologists back in the 1960s and 1970s. For example, for the type of tumor that Sarah has, lymphoblastic lymphoma, the treatment is two years duration. It consists of an eight drug induction over nine weeks followed by an eight week consolidation course and then maintenance therapy for a total therapy duration of 24 months. For chemotherapy for lymphoma, there are three phases, as listed above. The induction phase is designed to put the patient into remission. Consolidation chemotherapy is given to patients who have gone into remission and is designed to kill off any residual cancer cells that might be present, thus increasing the chance of complete cure. Maintenance chemotherapy is the ongoing, longer term use of chemotherapy to lower the risk of recurrence after a cancer has gone into remission. It's basically lower dose chemotherapy given for two to three years to help keep the cancer from returning.

So it's quite possible that Sarah has no detectable cancer. If that's the case, it's the chemotherapy that she's received thus far that almost certainly did it, not the herbs and vitamins. If that's the case, it also means that failing to consolidation and maintenance chemotherapy greatly increases the chance that Sarah Hershberger's lymphoma will relapse, a chance that is probably a near certainty if she only received one or two rounds of chemotherapy, as has been reported. That is the price of quackery. Worse, relapsed cancer is always harder to treat. The first shot at treating cancer is always the best shot, with the best odds of eradicating the cancer. Letting cancer relapse through incomplete treatment breeds resistant tumor cells the same way that not finishing a complete course of antibiotics contributes to the development of resistant bacteria.

The next part of Mr. Michael's analysis is even more unbelievable:

The Hershberger family says they never were told the chemotherapy was part of a research project using experimental chemicals. They also said the hospital did not get their signature for the second phase of different chemicals and only Sarah was asked to “put her name on the line.” They claim they were not told of the serious side effects. They said Sarah’s confidential medical information was given to the news media violating federal privacy laws. After a significant improvement in killing the cancer, they saw that the chemo was starting to kill Sarah and decided to stop the treatment and employ a better option to stop the cancer altogether. This is when the hospital took legal action to keep Sarah in the treatment study.

This part sounds highly dubious. One thing that you need to understand about pediatric cancer is that a very high percentage of patients with pediatric cancers are enrolled in clinical trials, well over 50%. Compare this to the 5% or so of adults with cancer who participate in clinical trials. Indeed, this is one of the reasons why survival rates for pediatric cancers have improved so much over the last four decades. So it would not be the least bit surprising if Akron Children's Hospital enrolled Sarah Hershberger on a clinical trial. In fact, I'd be disappointed in the hospital if its doctors didn't at least offer her parents a clinical trial.

Clinical trials run by facilities that receive any federal funding or grants (as Akron Children's Hospital surely does) are overseen by the Office of Human Research Protections (OHRP Department of Health and Human Services, and children are considered a vulnerable population for which extra protections are mandated. I find it highly unlikely that Akron Children's Hospital didn't get the appropriate informed consent. However, I never completely dismiss the possibility that I could be wrong. So here's what I propose. If Andy Hershberger really thinks that Akron Children's Hospital failed to obtain proper informed consent, he has only to report it to the OHRP. If the drug in the study is a new drug, then he could report the issue to the FDA as well. In fact, I would very much urge him to do so if he thinks that he was not offered adequate informed consent for a clinical trial.

Next up, Michael accuses the hospital of being all about the money:

ACH will lose as much as $1,000,000 or more by not treating Sarah the full 110 weeks in this study and, according to our sources close to the case, has already billed $130,000 for the first five weeks. Add to this the various pediatric cancer research grants and other funds it is receiving directly or indirectly for this type of study. This is not counting the billings for treatments for the long-term side effects such as other cancers, kidney dysfunction, heart problems and nerve damage—all common for those that survive chemotherapy.

This is, of course, a misrepresentation of how clinical trials work. In clinical trials, the funding agency pays for all clinical trial-related treatments and tests that are not standard-of-care. The rest are billed regularly. Moreover, for the most part, hospitals do not make money off of clinical trials. The infrastructure to run them is hideously expensive, and funding agencies often don't quite cover the full cost, particularly in these days of the sequester, which has hit NIH-funded clinical trials hard.

Ironically, Michael asks a question that should make all of those ranting about how greedy and evil Akron Children's Hospital supposedly is think:

Why is the hospital going to all the time and expense, even with the risk of tarnishing their reputation, all to make sure their advice is taken as opposed to other available treatments widely known in Europe as well as clinics in the U.S.? After all, these are Amish people, and it could become an extremely costly public relations nightmare. ACH and NEOMED may have banked on the Amish to stay quiet and not talk to the outside world, knowing also the Amish does not sue in court thereby making more information public.

I've been asking the same question myself. It would have been so much easier for ACH to do nothing, to shrug its collective shoulder and let the Hershbergers do whatever they wanted to with Sarah. It would have been far easier, far less trouble, and far less expensive. By any stretch of the imagination, it would have been the easy way out. But ACH didn't take the easy way out. While conspiracy theorists might fantasize that this is because there is some amazing prize that makes all the bad publicity and harassment by the "health freedom" crowd worthwhile. Reasonable people know that this is a matter of principle. The hospital is willing to go through all this hassle because making sure that Sarah Hershberger is treated according to science-based medicine is the right thing to do.

Categories

More like this

it took two millennia to correct the KJV “mistranslation”

Oh, you know what I mean.

I am almost beginning to wonder of Mykaayah goes to a branch of Mr Woo's church, except that there is more debate about the original ancestry of the chosen people (usually landing on olive-skinned Mediterranean peoples as an answer). Fascinatingly, one person tracing our ancestry told my father they traced our family lineage back to the 4th century, when we were Jews living in Greece.

There is a movement in many denominations to abandon contemporary Christian holidays and Sunday Sabbath. It isn't necessarily limited to just one.

I am a Yehudite if you must know and I am proud of my heritage. Explain that to me smarty.

Given that it's extremely unlikely that you have any particular knowledge of the what most people are discussing when they say "Yehudite," which isn't a religion but the residents of Yehud, especially around the time of the construction of the Second Temple, I'm going with your being incredibly dense.

(The underlying assertion is that 95%+ of modern Jews are actually "Edomites" or "Khazars"; Paul was a "Benjimite," not a "Jew," etc. In other words, Mykaayah is claiming superiority to Jews.)

Wow. Faith healing dentist turns fillings to gold? Is it wrong for me to wonder what's the point? I can see wanting a damaged tooth healed, but gee, go to a dental school... :-(

Oh, and given the "my heritage" part, I would be remiss in failing to point to Haile Selassie. This bowl of word salad gives the general flavor.

[2] NOPE, do not believe in Greek Mythology. They are the ones who messed up the bible with their translations.

You mean the story about the 72 scholars independently producing exactly the same translation, word-for-word, thus proving they were divinely inspired, was a crock? My surprise, let me show you it!

By The Very Rever… (not verified) on 12 Jan 2014 #permalink

One other thing:

I have come into knowledge and know the truth now. At that time I did not understand and was not being told the truth. Yes, I went on the 50 day fast because we were told to. I am glad I did it because I went on it with a sincere heart and I left that church.

Yet,

My Pastor still prays for the sick and they are still getting healed, HIV/Aids, cancer, Highblood problems, limbs straightened out and healing blindness on the eyes and so many other things.

However,

I went to an old fashion revival about five days after the diagnosis and the preacher anointed his hands with oil, placed his hands on my head and prayer a prayer of faith over me.

So which is it? Are the pastor and the preacher the same, or was the miraculous healing outside of the church that you left? Why not stick with whoever has been granted the miraculous powers by G-d? If he wasn't telling you "the truth," why did he have these powers?

The underlying assertion is that 95%+ of modern Jews are actually “Edomites” or “Khazars"

Although she doesn't know it, Mykaayah's actually stumbled onto what has been an interesting debate in population genetics over the past 10-15 years: Where did the Ashkenazi come from? Coincidentally, there's been quite a bit of movement on this issue in the past year, and these 2 recent papers put the issue largely to rest:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24104924
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24346185

TBruce:

Whoa, so the “Christians on board” travelled 2000 years back in time to crucify the Son of God? I guess they had to make damn sure that the basis for their religion really happened. Don’t know how they managed the resurrection thing, though. Drugs and a defibrillator, maybe?

Mykaayah is calling folks like lilady and me Pharisees, basically. It's a popular insult among the *particularly* holy-roller types. Which, given her references to following the Commandments and subsequent talk about being a *real* Jew (not like those posers who actually practice Judaism), seems a wee bit hypocritical.

I also am amused at how she didn't even blink at my pointing out how fast she put the lie to her assertion that she knows what the Word really is (Jesus, not the Bible), and that she never responded to me calling her out on that.

BTW, Mykaanah, you mentioned the genocide of Indians by Europeans. It's interesting you either are unaware of or excuse the contribution of black people. Perhaps you feel they get a free pass because most of their ancestors came to the Americas by force, but personally I don't think that's much of an excuse for perpetuating the violence. Black divisions of the US Army were very involved with the subjugation of the West. There aren't a lot of saints involved in the whole mess. We're all humans, and if you are really following Christ, you would know that.

Only by grace, and all that.

By Calli Arcale (not verified) on 12 Jan 2014 #permalink

I need to answer this question, since I am taking a break from classes. My healing was outside that 6,000 member church. It was in a smaller church with a smaller congregation in Hollis Queens, N.Y.. The Pastor of that church was not the one that prayed for me it was the one in the smaller church, that and other reasons are why I left. In the beginning was the Word and the Word was God and the Word was with God and the Word was made flesh and dwelt among us and we knew it not. That is why I believe the Word was Jesus and it will be that Word that will judge the world not the bible, it has been tampered with and mistranslated

And yet you twice have used the Word of God to refer to the Bible in this thread (e.g. in your first post, "This is what Jesus said in the Word of God"). You seem to have some consistency issues.

I am glad you understand that it is a work of men. I hope you also understand this is true of the original editions of each book, not just the modern compilations and translations. Matthew, Mark, Luke and John were not taking dictation; they were writing their own witnessing of Christ, in their own words. This does not make it less valuable, of course.

Incidentally, you decried the Greeks for mistranslating the Bible. Did you know that most of the original books of the New Testament were originally written in Greek? Not translated, actually written in the language. Greek was sort of a lingua franca at the time, the language of scholars, particularly in the Eastern Mediterranean and Egypt; the region of Alexander the Great's influence, basically. It provided a common language for people struggling through the huge range of languages and dialects spoken in the area even before the Romans arrived and brought Latin along with them.

By Calli Arcale (not verified) on 14 Jan 2014 #permalink

Matthew, Mark, Luke and John were not taking dictation; they were writing their own witnessing of Christ, in their own words.

Actuallym, the authors-- who were not eyewitnesses and are themselves not identified in the text--collated accounts from various oral traditions and written sources, considerably after the fact. Assigning their authorship to named disciples is a tradition that dates to the second century AD.