The death of Jade Erick from intravenous curcumin: Mystery solved

Kim Kelly, ND (Not A Doctor). He prescribed the dose of intravenous turmeric that killed Jade Erick.

Finally, a mystery has been solved.

Nearly five months ago, a 30 year old woman named Jade Erick suffered a cardiac arrest, most likely due to anaphylactic shock, during the infusion of intravenous curcumin ordered by a California naturopath named Kim Kelly, ND (for Not-a-Doctor). Because Erick's death was so sudden and dramatic, the story briefly made national news. I viewed the tragic incident as yet another example of why "licensed" naturopaths, such as those in California or other states that have made the mistake of passing laws allowing the licensing of naturopaths, are no less likely to mess up your health or even kill you than "unlicensed" naturopaths, such as the naturopath in Bowling Green who was shot by the husband of one of his patients. The reason for the shooting? That naturopath had told the man's wife that "chemo is for losers" and treated her with the usual naturopathic voodoo, allowing the woman's cancer to progress until it was no longer treatable with conventional medicine.

Jade Erick didn't suffer from a life-threatening disease like cancer. She did, however, have a condition that almost certainly significantly affected her quality of life for the worse, namely eczema. Eczema is the name commonly given a group of medical conditions characterized by inflammation of the skin (i.e., rashes). The most common type of eczema is known as atopic dermatitis or atopic eczema, with the "atopic" referring to a group of diseases with an often inherited tendency to develop other allergic conditions. It's a pretty common condition, too, with around 10% to 20% of infants being affected and around 3% of adults. Most children with eczema "outgrow" it, but some people continue to have symptoms on and off for the rest of their lives. Because eczema's clinical course can be so varied and intermittent and also because the itching it causes can be very intense, it is a magnet for quacks like naturopaths. There are, of course, conventional medical treatments for eczema that relieve the itching and irritation and prevent rashes, but they leave much to be desired, again another characteristic of diseases or conditions that are quack magnets.

A little over a week ago, a number of readers sent me a link to an FDA safety alert and report of its investigation into Erick's death and another case of a serious hypersensitivity reaction due to intravenous curcumin. Included with these two links was a link to an alert about the risk of compounding medications. It turns out that what likely killed Jade Erick was a hypersensitivity reaction to the use of a component that wasn't pharmaceutical grade and is also known to cause hypersensitivity reactions. Let's take a look.

Jade Erick and the naturopath who killed her

As I mentioned before, Jade Erick was an otherwise healthy 30 year old woman with a chronic medical condition. For whatever reason, however she found him, she sought out treatment from a naturopath named Kim Kelly, who, as it turns out, has been a vocal advocate of intravenous curcumin to treat…just about everything. Indeed, although after Erick's death Kelly started scrubbing every mention of intravenous curcumin from his website, enough remained to demonstrate his enthusiasm for its use:

I am excited to announce that I've started administering intravenous curcumin. Curcumin has been used for thousands of years for culinary and medicinal reasons. People have used it to help with pain, inflammation, immune system, arthritis, liver conditions and cancer. It's also been found that intravenous curcumin in combination with vitamin C and glutathione (I call it the "Mother of All Antioxidants") has a potentiating effecting in helping people with chronic health conditions e.g. hepatitis C, liver fibrosis. Intravenous Curcumin is absorbed better, faster and can be given in much higher doses compared to taking it orally. Therefore, the benefits usually can be seen much sooner. Patients who have received it thus far have reported benefits very soon after treatment.

If you are suffering from any type of inflammatory condition, whether it be arthritis, autoimmune condition (e.g. scleroderma, lupus or rheumatoid arthritis), Alzheimers or dementia, this may be a great modality of treatment to try. It may require multiple treatments or may be just one treatment, depending on each person and the condition.

The safety, tolerability, and nontoxicity of curcumin at high doses have been well established by human clinical trials. Promising effects have been observed in patients with various pro-inflammatory diseases.

I can’t help but note that that last statement is absolutely false. Yes, orally administered curcumin is generally pretty safe even up to 8 g per day. However, intravenous curcumin hasn’t been well studied, as I discovered when I started doing more PubMed searches (although I did find a bunch of articles in which investigators were trying to use curcumin nanoparticles, micelles, and the like to administer curcumin IV). This is naturopathic “reasoning,” such as it is: If a little is good, a boatload would be better. Finally, if real medical science is investigating a natural product for one indication and it shows a bit of promise, then to naturopaths it must be a wonder medicine that cures everything—and I do mean everything. Take a look at the list of conditions for which Kelly claims treatment efficacy of IV curcumin:


  • Inflammatory Bowel Disease (Crohn's and Ulcerative Colitis)
  • Osteoarthritis
  • Post-Operative Inflammation
  • Irritable Bowel Syndrome
  • H. pylori infection


  • Type 2 Diabetes
  • Diabetic Nephropathy


  • Psoriasis
  • Vitiligo


  • Beta-Thalassemia
  • Hepatoprotection
  • Alcohol Intoxication
  • Chronic bacterial prostatitis
  • Alzheimer's
  • Atherosclerosis
  • Arsenic Exposure

Oddly enough, eczema is not on the list. Obviously, "Dr." Kelly expanded his list before treating Ms. Erick. In any case, it's always a huge red flag when I see a long list of unrelated diseases and conditions treated by the same drug or treatment. I mean, chronic bacterial prostatitis and atherosclerosis and arsenic exposure? Seriously? In any event, although curcumin has been a favorite of naturopaths for a long time, intravenous curcumin is a relative newcomer on the quack scene. The foremost promoter and popularizer of infusing this compound directly into the veins instead of administering it orally is Paul Anderson, who, as we will see, was so concerned about this death that he issued a disingenuous defense of what Kelly did.

As for Kelly himself, as I like to say, he is everything that organized naturopathy says a good "naturopathic physician" should be. Just look at his profile on his website:

Dr. Kim D. Kelly graduated from Bastyr University in 2001 and is a licensed Naturopathic doctor in the state of California. Growing up on a farm in Northern Minnesota is where he first had experience in the healing power of nature. This was further fostered when reading about the numerous clinical trials using alternative therapies when he was getting his Master’s of Public Health (MPH in Epidemiology) at the University of Minnesota. After realizing the power and effectiveness of alternative therapies, his career goal as Epidemiologist changed to wanting to become a Naturopathic Doctor; thus, he enrolled at Bastyr University in Seattle, WA.

Upon graduation from Bastyr, he underwent a rigorous three year training program at a cutting edge clinic, where he was trained by a team of medical and naturopathic doctors (Nazanin Kimiai, ND, LAc; Dietrich Klinghardt, MD, PhD; David Musnick, MD, MPH). Through his experience at this integrative clinic, Dr. Kelly learned the art and science of progressive healing modalities for musculoskeletal pain, autoimmune conditions, chronic infections (parasites, Lyme, mold), environmental & heavy metal toxicities and general health issues.

Dr. Kelly’s four years as technical director and consultant with Sabre Sciences has given him a strong background on use of bio-identical hormones and neurotransmitters for issues e.g. menopausal and andropause symptoms, PMS, insomnia, anxiety or chronic fatigue. His specialties include adrenal fatigue, thyroid disorders, hormonal issues in men and women (menopause, andropause, PMS, etc.), musculoskeletal pain and heavy metal detoxification. A lot of his practice also involves a technique called Biopuncture to help with chronic pain, headaches, gastritis, IBS and other health issues (See Service List for more details). He currently has an office in Encinitas.

Dr. Kelly has lectured locally and nationally on topics e.g. hormone balance for men and women, heavy metal toxicity and what we can do, nutritional research on Autism, gastrointestinal issues and natural medicine in San Diego.

In the world of naturopathy, Bastyr is the equivalent of Harvard or Stanford. Of course, being the Harvard or Stanford of quack schools is not saying much. After all, Bastyr recently sent a cease-and-desist letter to Britt Hermes, a former naturopath who graduated from Bastyr but eventually came to the realization that naturopathy is pure quackery and has been unrelentingly critical of her former alma mater ever since. My point, of course, is that Kelly graduated from what groups like the American Association of Naturopathic Physicians (AANP) view as the crème de la crème of naturopathy schools and is fully licensed in the largest state in the country. Of course, I can’t help but note that in his bio asserting his pseudoprofessional bona fides, he can’t help but mention one of naturopaths’ favorite forms of quackery, “heavy metal detox.” I find that appropriate.

Perusing the rest of Kelly's website, even without the benefit of the almighty Wayback Machine at, which rescues web pages from the memory hole every day, I found plenty of quackery offered by his practice. For instance, he offers biopuncture, naturopathic detoxing, hormonal balance treatment, IV nutrition, and "wellness programs." Biopuncture, I note, is an unholy combination of acupuncture and homeopathy so quacky that Dr. Oz promoted it. Kelly describes it thusly:

Biopuncture is a technique that combines neural therapy, trigger point therapy, prolotherapy and homotoxicology. It stimulates the body’s own healing mechanisms thus speeding up the process of injury recovery, natural rejuvenation/repair and also lowers pain and inflammation. The technique involves using pin-prick needles to inject miniature amounts of homeopathic remedies under the skin or into muscle encouraging the body to start healing and to help stimulate local blood circulation.

In other words, it's some most excellently ridiculous woo, a witches' brew of quackery, to go along with all the other nonsense in Kelly's blog, such as (of course) more biopuncture and more "detoxification," along with other quackery such as adrenal fatigue treatment, intravenous vitamin C, and a dangerous modality like intravenous peroxide for chronic infections. All of this costs only $150 per 30 minutes plus the cost of the therapy.

Not surprisingly, when a real medical emergency happened right in his own office, "Dr." Kelly wasn't prepared to deal with it. The result is described in the FDA report:

On March 10, 2017, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration received an adverse event report concerning a 30-year-old female patient who experienced cardiac arrest after IV administration of a curcumin emulsion product compounded by ImprimisRx. The patient reportedly had a history of allergies and was being treated for eczema by a naturopathic doctor. Within minutes of starting the infusion, the patient became pulseless and required CPR. The patient suffered anoxic (depleted oxygen) brain injury and subsequently died. An adverse reaction to infused curcumin solution was identified as a cause of death by the local authorities.

So what caused the hypersensitivity reaction that killed Jade Erick within minutes of the start of her infusion of IV curcumin? The FDA thinks it's found the cause both of her death and of a similar hypersensitivity that nearly killed a 71 year old man who was being treated for thrombocytopenia (a low platelet count) at a holistic health center. Amazingly, that "holistic" health center appears to have actually had medications to deal with an acute anaphylactic reaction, which kept him alive long enough to get him to an emergency room. In fairness, Erick's reaction appears to have been so fast that there might not have been time to administer diphenhydramine and epinephrine.

Beware compounding pharmacies that play fast and loose with ingredients

In response to the reports of Jade Erick's sudden death, the FDA did what the FDA does very well. It investigated. It turns out that the intravenous curcumin emulsion used was manufactured by ImprimisRx Pharmaceuticals, a compounding pharmacy based in San Diego, California. There are, of course, legitimate compounding pharmacies, and such pharmacies serve a useful role in medicine, but there are also a lot of compounding pharmacies that cater to naturopaths, mixing up combinations of supplements, "natural" medications, and the like for that particular market. ImprimisRx appears to be one such pharmacy, manufacturing both legitimate FDA-approved drugs and compounds like its Curcumin Emulsion MDV and, of course, intravenous vitamin C. It also manufactures intravenous EDTA for chelation therapy.

The FDA collected samples from the IV bag used to dose Jade Erick and from the ImprimisRx curcumin emulsion vial used to prepare the IV bag. It also analyzed the samples of ImprimisRx’s curcumin emulsion product and identified the presence of certain contaminants and impurities. It found a number of rather interesting (and disturbing) things. First, the FDA noted that there wasn't nearly as much curcumin in ImprimisRx’s curcumin emulsion product as claimed on the labeling. The solution in the IV bag contained only 2.34 μg/mL of curcuminoids, which is only around 1% of the curcumin concentration intended to be administered. It also found that the concentration in the emulsion vial contained only around 0.205 mg/mL of curcuminoids, which is less than 2% of the curcumin concentration represented on the label. One of the big problems with administering curcumin is that it undergoes rapid degradation at physiologic pH, and that might explain why the concentration of curcumin in the vial was so much lower than what was represented on the label. Of course, a good compounding pharmacy should know these issues and limitations and take steps to mitigate them. Clearly ImprimisRx did not. As a result, Kelly and all the naturopaths who thought they were giving their patients "high dose" curcumin were probably giving them less than what a patient would get by taking curcumin supplements orally.

More importantly and relevant to what caused Jade Erick's death, the FDA found this:

FDA collected and analyzed samples of PEG 40 castor oil from the same lot of ImprimisRx curcumin emulsion product that was administered to the female patient. FDA identified 1.25% w/w DEG [diethylene glycol] in the PEG [polyethylene glycol] 40 castor oil. The label of the tested PEG 40 castor oil includes the warning “CAUTION: For manufacturing or laboratory use only.” The PEG 40 castor oil used by ImprimisRx was ungraded, and not, for example, pharmaceutical grade or food grade. Ungraded products are suitable for general industrial or research purposes and typically are not suitable for human consumption or therapeutic use. There is no U.S. Pharmacopeia (USP) monograph for PEG 40 castor oil.

The FDA notes that drugs, including FDA-approved products, containing polyethylene glycol castor oil have been "associated with severe and sometimes fatal hypersensitivity reactions and include warnings about these reactions in their labels." One example IV paclitaxel containing Cremophor® EL (PEG 35 castor oil), which can cause severe hypersensitivity reactions in up to 20% of patients. That's why patients receiving paclitaxel are premedicated with steroids, and it's why a new formulation lacking the PEG 35 castor oil, Abraxane, is coming into wider usage. The FDA further noted:

Some of the other ingredients in ImprimisRx’s product, including curcumin, also have been associated with hypersensitivity reactions when administered intravenously. There are reports of contact allergies to a metabolite of curcumin, tetrahydrocurcumin, for instance. In addition, there is little to no toxicologic or clinical information available regarding the safety of IV curcumin, and evidence is lacking that curcumin is an effective therapy for eczema or thrombocytopenia. There are no FDA-approved curcumin for injection products.

The ungraded PEG 40 castor oil in ImprimisRx’s curcumin emulsion product may have contained components that resulted in the hypersensitivity reactions. Castor bean seeds and pollens are known to be associated with hypersensitivity reactions. Food grade castor oil is processed to remove the potentially allergenic castor bean constituents, but ungraded PEG 40 castor oil may not be allergen free. In addition to allergens, other potentially harmful contaminants and impurities could be present in the ungraded PEG 40 castor oil.

It was also noted that DEG is a central nervous system depressant, as well as a potent kidney and liver toxin that can cause kidney failure. It's commonly used in industrial products like antifreeze and brake fluid.

The FDA concluded:

FDA’s investigation into the adverse events associated with ImprimisRx’s curcumin emulsion product for injection highlights some of the risks associated with compounded drugs, particularly those that use non-pharmaceutical grade components and ingredients lacking a USP monograph. The risks illustrated in this case include:

  • the absence of a label warning about hypersensitivity reactions associated with the PEG 40 castor oil;
  • the use of an ungraded inactive ingredient, i.e., PEG 40 castor oil, that is not suitable for human consumption or therapeutic use and may contain impurities such as DEG; and
  • the IV administration of curcumin, despite the fact that its safety profile by this route of administration has not been established, nor has its effectiveness in treating eczema or thrombocytopenia.

So basically, it appears from the FDA report that a perfect storm of woo killed Jade Erick: A naturopath using an unproven treatment plus a compounding pharmacy cutting corners manufacturing its products using PEG 40 castor oil that wasn't pharmaceutical grade and failing to place a warning label on its curcumin emulsion warning that components of the emulsion can cause hypersensitivity reactions. According to the FDA, ImprimisRx recalled its unexpired products containing the ungraded castor oil on June 23, 2017, which was over two months after the second hypersensitivity reaction (in the 71 year old man) was reported.

The danger of some compounding pharmacies

Another lapse in this case included that there was no prescription for the IV curcumin found. At least, the company told a media outlet that it did not have a prescription. Britt Hermes, in her discussion of the case, speculated based on her experience as a naturopath about how such a thing might have happened and how Kelly might have obtained the curcumin for Erick without a prescription:

Kelly may have used a vial of the curcumin emulsion that was obtained under a prescription for another one of his patients. My former naturopathic colleagues in Arizona at times purchased compounded products in bulk for a single patient to then be used for multiple patients. This stockpiling allowed naturopathic doctors to have compounded drugs on-hand, thereby expediting treatments for multiple patients using only one prescription. Or, Kelly may have obtained the curcumin emulsion from a physician or another naturopathic doctor who had product on hand for their own patients. The borrowing of medical supplies, including compounded substances, is a common practice in the naturopathic community. Either way, using a prescription of one patient for another patient is not permitted by the FDA.

Worse, this sort of occurrence can't be said to have been entirely unexpected, given ImprimisRx's previous run-in with the FDA. Last year, the FDA inspected ImprimisRx's manufacturing facility in Pennsylvania and found a number of violations. These included failures to test:

  • aqueous solutions and suspensions or encapsulated powders to determine if they meet specifications for the intended, labeled dose of active drug ingredient
  • products intended for inhalation to verify that the particle size is correct
  • inhalation products for microbial contamination
  • products to determine appropriate expiration dates

The inspection also found that there were "no written procedures for production and process controls to assure that the drug products have the identity, strength, quality, and purity they purport or are represented to possess," which likely explains a lot about how the curcumin emulsion could have a potency of only 2% of what was claimed on the label, especially since the FDA found a number of other lapses indicating what can only be called a lack of concern for preventing bacterial contamination and assuring that what is in the product matches what the label says.

Compounding pharmacies can play an important role in medicine. For instance, special compounding might be required if a patient needs a medication to be made without a certain dye or inactive ingredient because of an allergy or needs a medication in liquid or suppository form that is not manufactured in such forms. Unfortunately, a lot of companies go beyond such needs, as the FDA noted in a recent article on compounding pharmacies:

"Some aspects of these firms’ operations appear more consistent with those of drug manufacturers than with those of traditional pharmacies," says Bernstein. "Some firms make large amounts of drugs that appear to be copies of FDA-approved, commercially available drugs when it does not appear that there is a medical need for an individual patient to receive a compounded version of the drug."

The FDA also expressed concerns about compounding pharmacies just this year, noting serious incidents linked with them. Most of these incidents have to do with contamination with microorganisms. For instance, in 2012, there was an outbreak of fungal meningitis linked to an injectable steroid medication manufactured by a compounding pharmacy. In 2011 and 2012, 33 eye surgery patients in seven states suffered a rare fungal infection of the eye linked to injectable drug products, resulting in partial to severe vision loss, while in 2011 repackaged injections of Avastin (bevacizumab) also caused serious eye infections in the Miami area. These latter two incidents resulted in serious vision loss in some patients. Some patients injected with the contaminated Avastin lost the remaining vision in the eye being treated.

It's stories like this that make me laugh derisively any time I hear a politician complain about FDA "overreach." In reality, the reason these sorts of incidents occur with a distressing regularity is because the FDA is underfunded and understaffed. It has a hard time overseeing pharmaceutical company manufacturing facilities adequately, much less compounding pharmacies, allowing compounding pharmacies like ImprimisRx to continue doing business. Indeed, look at Imprimis Pharmaceuticals' (IMMY) statement regarding the FDA's findings. Basically, the company is trying to shift the blame for Jade Erick's death from its product to…well…anyone else.

For example:

Imprimis had no knowledge of the allergy histories of the subject patients.

So what? Imprimis manufactured a product with components known to cause acute hypersensitivity reactions, and there was no warning of this on the product label.

FDA testing of the IV bag from the 30 year-old patient revealed "no drugs or poisons including diethylene glycol [DEG] at a level greater than 0.1% by volume, were identified in the IV bag contents using GC-MS." We believe that evidence thus far does not support the 30 year-old patient's death being caused by PEG 40 Castor Oil or DEG.

WTF? 0.1% is a high concentration for "drugs or poisons." Basically, it's one part in a thousand. This is not something that strikes me as exonerating Imprimis. Quite the contrary. It suggests that the FDA was quite correct about Imprimis' shoddy manufacturing if "drugs or poisons" other than what was supposed to be in the product were present at a concentration as high as 0.1% Again, WTF?

PEG Castor Oils are suitable excipients used in both compounding and the pharmaceutical industry and there are multiple examples of commercial injections that are FDA approved for which polyethoxylated castor oils are a component of, such as paclitaxel injection, teniposide injection, docetaxel injection, and cyclosporine injection.

This is true. However, these drugs also have warnings that they can cause hypersensitivity reactions. As I mentioned above, in the case of paclitaxel and docetaxel (both taxanes), patients are premedicated with steroids because the risk of hypersensitivity reactions due to the PEG castor oil excipient is so high.

Imprimis received written documentation from its FDA registered and inspected supplier as to the suitability of its PEG 40 Castor Oil material for use in human compounded products. This documentation, received prior to use of the material, stated specifically, "We certify that our product, P2404 PEG Castor Oil is manufactured, packaged and held in compliance with 21 CFR, Parts 210 and 211 of the United States Code of Federal Regulations and is suitable for pharmacy compounding use."

OK, Imprimis and the FDA can't both be correct. Imprimis denies using non-pharmaceutical grade PEG 40 Castor Oil, and the FDA found that it did. I would tend to go with the FDA on this. Basically, Imprimis is blaming its supplier, which, I suppose, is possible, but given all the other negative findings in the FDA inspection last year I'm not about to give Imprimis the benefit of the doubt about anything.

According to federal and state regulations, it is permissible for Imprimis (and any other pharmacy) to use curcumin in human drug compounding (FDA's 503A Category 1 for Bulk Drugs for Use in Compounding).

I note that this statement, dated July 1, lists curcumin as being nominated for use in compounding under section 503A and lists it among other substances being under evaluation. Seriously, Imprimis, did you really think we wouldn't click on the link and read the actual FDA document?

Imprimis maintains that the prescriptions it filled for the subject curcumin emulsion vials were valid, labeled properly, and that the curcumin emulsion dispensed was correctly made according to state and federal law.

Given that intravenous curcumin is not FDA-approved for any indication, I find this hard to believe. If true, though, it is a huge glaring problem with the law that sleazy companies like Imprimis exploit.

The Great Yellow Hope diminished

It's not surprising that naturopaths would be attracted to curcumin as the cure for everything. They love to latch on to natural compounds that show promise in clinical medicine, and it is true that curcumin has been studied widely as a potential cancer treatment, so much so that I used to jokingly refer to it as the "Great Yellow Hope" for cancer. It's also been studied for inflammatory diseases as well. Indeed, there have been lots of seemingly promising experiments in vitro and in animals published, but clinical trials carried out thus far have been very disappointing. A recent review in the Journal of Medicinal Chemistry was particularly damning:

Curcumin has recently been classified as both a PAINS (pan-assay interference compounds) and an IMPS (invalid metabolic panaceas) candidate. The likely false activity of curcumin in vitro and in vivo has resulted in >120 clinical trials of curcuminoids against several diseases. No double- blinded, placebo controlled clinical trial of curcumin has been successful.

I explained, with the help of Derek Lowe, what PAINS and IMPS compounds are, why curcumin is almost certainly one of these, and further why that means curcumin's benefits likely will not translate into clinical practice.

Here's a general rule of thumb, particularly with a compound like curcumin. When clinical studies are this unimpressive and everyone's scrambling to handwave "alternative explanations" for efficacy, it's not a good sign. Indeed, the enthusiasm for curcumin among cancer researchers has always puzzled me, given how weak the existing evidence base is for its efficacy and the serious drawbacks it has in terms of solubility, instability, and bioavailability. Naturopaths, as is their wont when looking for legitimacy, take that enthusiasm and turn it up to 11, because the success and adoption of curcumin by conventional medicine would validate their worldview about the usefulness of natural products. It is this worldview that leads to tragedies like the death of Jade Erick.

The fallout

Unfortunately, it appears that naturopaths will never learn. After the death of Jade Erick, naturopaths did what naturopaths always do after one of their own causes harm to a patient through quackery. They circled the wagons and tried to find strategies not to have to take serious disciplinary action against Kelly Kim.

There is, however, a very interesting wrinkle. The California law providing for naturopathic licensure is scheduled to sunset at the end of this year. There is, however, a new bill (SB 796), introduced by Jerry Hill (D-San Mateo) that would extend naturopathic licensure to 2022. The case of Jade Erick would thus seem to represent a dire threat to naturopathic licensure in California. "Seem" is the operative word, sadly. The bill passed the California Senate unanimously in July and appears to be wending its way through the Assembly committee process unimpeded.

Between the government-imposed weakness of the FDA mandated by anti-regulation politicians and the willingness of politicians to keep licensing quackery, I fear there will be more cases like Jade Erick.


More like this

March seemed to be naturopathic quackery month. Let's face it, though, every month is naturopathic quackery month. It's just that in March there were two stories that really caught my eye. The first was the story of a naturopath in Bowling Green named Juan Sanchez, who was gunned down in his office…
Yesterday, I wrote about the case of Jade Erick, a 30-year-old woman whose death was caused by naturopathic quackery. It's not entirely clear if it was intravenous turmeric that killed her. That's what the press consistently reported. It's more likely that it was intravenous curcumin, which is…
It was only just yesterday that I recounted the story of a naturopathic quack in Bowling Green, KY who told a cancer patient that "chemo is for losers," promising her that he eliminate her tumor within three months. She listened to him, and as a result she died, as she and her husband were suing…
Ever since I first realized that naturopathy is a cornucopia of quackery administered by naturopaths in a "One from Column A, Two from Column B"-style of practice, I've opposed the licensure of naturopaths. Not surprisingly, naturopaths crave state licensure because it puts the imprimatur of the…

I am not surprised by any of the revelations here. Naturopaths seem to think that the normal rules don't apply to them. Treating a patient with an IV 'drug' without a prescription.

ImprimisRX's behaviour is beyond the pale. Using ingredients that were insufficiently pure for developing IV 'medications' should never be acceptable.

By Chris Preston (not verified) on 14 Aug 2017 #permalink

Aren't there Federal laws against administering prescription drugs to somebody who doesn't have a prescription for that drug? It is reasonable that such laws should not apply in a medical emergency, but Ms. Erick was not in a medical emergency when "Dr." Kelly started administering that IV.

The FDA needs to make examples of "Dr." Kelly and ImprimisRx, par encourager les autres.

By Eric Lund (not verified) on 14 Aug 2017 #permalink

@ Eric 2--Sadly, I wouldn't expect much on this. When Michael Jackson died, they found bottles of propofol (a sedative used to put a patient under for procedures or at the start of anesthesia) with him that hadn't been prescribed to him by his doctor. As I remember, nothing really happened to that horrible doctor regarding his license until he was convicted of manslaughter, which I found disappointing, given that there is no explainable reason for giving propofol outside of a hospital/operating room setting.

By Chris Hickie (not verified) on 14 Aug 2017 #permalink

PEG 40 castor oil is used in cosmetics, so plenty of unhelpful dubious info is to be found on the web.

In case anyone else is curious:
It is also known as polyoxyl 40 castor oil and belongs to a large group of compounds known as polyoxyethylene castor oil derivatives (which I find more instructive than polyethylene glycol ...). It appears that the "40" is actually from hydrogenated castor oil and would be made by reacting ethylene oxide with the oil in a ratio of 40 moles per mole.

It is considered to be non-toxic, "However, there are
reports of cardiovascular changes and nephrotoxicity in various species of animals. Several serious anaphylactic reactions, cardiotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity, and
pulmonary toxicity have also been observed in humans and
animals following parenteral administration of formulations containing polyoxyethylene castor oil derivatives. The precise mechanism of the reaction is not known." (Handbook of Pharmaceutical Excipients, 6th ed, Rowe et al)
Very clearly anyone administering it should be aware of these risks and in a position to do appropriate monitoring and response. That doubtless includes a number of naturopaths that is, for practical purposes, indistinguishable from zero.

Are naturoprats in general in the US permitted to prescribe and administer IV preparations?

“We certify that our product, P2404 PEG Castor Oil is manufactured, packaged and held in compliance with 21 CFR, Parts 210 and 211 of the United States Code of Federal Regulations and is suitable for pharmacy compounding use.”

Suitable for what categories of compounding? You can get petroleum jelly suitable for all kinds of pharmaceutical products, but you wouldn't want to mainline it.
As far as I can tell from the tables of contents & some skimming, parts 210 & 211 are entirely concerned with facilities (including toilets in the plant) and procedures, and have nothing to say about suitability for purpose.

I really don't like the tone of this article and it's complete disregard for naturopaths. Don't bother to mention that doctors kill way more patients everyday!!! And conventional medicine is absolute garbage at helping people with autoimmune diseases. Part of the reason is because the drug industry has the health industry by the balls. They basically control it all. Scumbags

This crap is still for sale. Order yours here.

By MadisonMD (not verified) on 14 Aug 2017 #permalink

Today, I injected five marijuanas.

JR: "I really don’t like the tone of this article and it’s complete disregard for naturopaths".

It is because of the naturopathic disregard of science where they still use fictional "treatments" like homeopathy, reiki, etc. Also because of their total disregard to medical ethics, as described in the article.

"Don’t bother to mention that doctors kill way more patients everyday!!!"

Shall we add total disregard with basic statistics. There are actually many more real doctors than naturopath. Also, they seem to be really lousy with "killing" patients, since the average lifespan in the USA is close to eighty years old.

And yet the poor woman under the care of that naturopath was just thirty years old. Because of Not a Doctor Kelly, she lost about fifty years of life.

"Don’t bother to mention that doctors kill way more patients everyday!!!"

Is that supposed to make it okay when a profiteer negligently kills a woman in his quest to find more things to sell a treatment for? What kind of a sociopath are you?

"And conventional medicine is absolute garbage at helping people with autoimmune diseases."

Therefore, selling actual fake treatments is fine, is that it?

Seriously, if you're mad about mainstream medicine doing this why the hell are you okay with naturpaths doing it?

"Part of the reason is because the drug industry has the health industry by the balls."

The only thing holding the drug industry back is laws requiring them to prove the treatments actually work. Naturopaths don't tend to wait for that proof. Again, if you are honest about what you are saying, you should be even angrier with naturopathy.

By Calli Arcale (not verified) on 14 Aug 2017 #permalink

I'm going there. Fair warning.
I know we're not supposed to judge from appearances, but in our dealings it may be almost the only evidence we have to evaluate people who ask for our trust.
If someone I went to for treatment displayed the awful tasteless outfit that makes him look like a barker for a carnival straight out of Ray Bradbury that is displayed by Kim Kelly in the photo above, I would probably mumble something about having the wrong address and get the hell out of there as fast as I could limp.
I once went to see a well-recommended pain management specialist for sciatica. He proposed a course of intraspinal injections. I noticed that he was slumped in his chair, was eating a danish while he spoke with me and getting crumbs on himself, and had an open button on his expensive shirt. When he asked me about setting an appointment for the injections, I told him I would think about it and left.
I don't think I judged him unfairly. I felt his slovenly appearance indicated that he might be equally careless in his approach to any procedure he might do for me, and I don't think I was wrong in my reaction.

By Old Rockin' Dave (not verified) on 14 Aug 2017 #permalink


By Belinda aleman (not verified) on 14 Aug 2017 #permalink

Ms. Aleman, you seem to be protesting a bit much. Obviously you would never give money to any pharmaceutical company like Hyland's or Boiron. But to help you save money on homeopathic medications (which from a relative I heard can be very pricey), let me share this process drawn from Hahnemann's actual writings:

Recipe for Nat Mur or Natrum Mur or Natrium Mur or Natrum muriaticum:

1) Take ½ teaspoon of sea salt and dissolve into 1 cup of distilled water in a bottle.

2) Shake well.

3) This is a 1C solution (ratio 1/100).

4) Take ½ teaspoon of the 1C solution and put it a bottle with 1 cup of distilled water, throw out the 1C solution.

5) Shake well.

6) This is a 2C solution (ratio 1/10000).

7) Take ½ teaspoon of the 2C solution and put it a bottle with 1 cup of distilled water, throw out the 2C solution.

8) Shake well.

9) This is a 3C solution (ratio 1/1000000).

10) Take ½ teaspoon of the 3C solution and put it a bottle with 1 cup of distilled water, throw out the 3C solution.

11) Shake well.

12) This is a 4C solution (ratio 1/100000000).

13) Take ½ teaspoon of the 4C solution and put it a bottle with 1 cup of distilled water, throw out the 4C solution.

14) Shake well.

15) This is a 5C solution (ratio 1/10000000000).

16) Take ½ teaspoon of the 5C solution and put it a bottle with 1 cup of distilled water, throw out the 5C solution.

17) Shake well.

18) This is a 6C solution (ratio 1/1000000000000).

19) Take ½ teaspoon of the 6C solution and put it a bottle with 1 cup of distilled water, throw out the 6C solution.

20) Shake well.

21) This is a 7C solution (ratio 1/100000000000000).

22) Take ½ teaspoon of the 7C solution and put it a bottle with 1 cup of distilled water, throw out the 7C solution.

23) Shake well.

24) This is an 8C solution (ratio 1/10000000000000000).

25) Take ½ teaspoon of the 8C solution and put it a bottle with 1 cup of distilled water, throw out the 8C solution.

26) Shake well.

27) This is a 9C solution (ratio 1/1000000000000000000).

28) Take ½ teaspoon of the 9C solution and put it a bottle with 1 cup of distilled water, throw out the 9C solution.

29) Shake well.

30) This is a 10C solution (ratio 1/100000000000000000000).

31) Take ½ teaspoon of the 10C solution and put it a bottle with 1 cup of distilled water, throw out the 10C solution.

32) Shake well.

33) This is a 11C solution (ratio 1/10000000000000000000000).

34) Take ½ teaspoon of the 11C solution and put it a bottle with 1 cup of distilled water, throw out the 11C solution.

35) Shake well.

36) This is a 12C solution (ratio 1/1000000000000000000000000).

37) Take ½ teaspoon of the 12C solution and put it a bottle with 1 cup of distilled water, throw out the 12C solution.

38) Shake well.

39) This is a 13C solution (ratio 1/100000000000000000000000000).

40) Take ½ teaspoon of the 13C solution and put it a bottle with 1 cup of distilled water, throw out the 13C solution.

41) Shake well.

42) This is a 14C solution (ratio 1/10000000000000000000000000000).

43) Take ½ teaspoon of the 14C solution and put it a bottle with 1 cup of distilled water, throw out the 14C solution.

44) Shake well.

45) This is a 15C solution (ratio 1/1000000000000000000000000000000).

46) Take ½ teaspoon of the 15C solution and put it a bottle with 1 cup of distilled water, throw out the 15C solution.

47) Shake well.

48) This is a 16C solution (ratio 1/100000000000000000000000000000000).

49) Take ½ teaspoon of the 16C solution and put it a bottle with 1 cup of distilled water, throw out the 16C solution.

50) Shake well.

51) This is a 17C solution (ratio 1/10000000000000000000000000000000000).

52) Take ½ teaspoon of the 17C solution and put it a bottle with 1 cup of distilled water, throw out the 17C solution.

53) Shake well.

54) This is an 18C solution (ratio 1/1000000000000000000000000000000000000).

55) Take ½ teaspoon of the 18C solution and put it a bottle with 1 cup of distilled water, throw out the 18C solution.

56) Shake well.

57) This is a 19C solution (ratio 1/100000000000000000000000000000000000000).

58) Take ½ teaspoon of the 19C solution and put it a bottle with 1 cup of distilled water, throw out the 19C solution.

59) Shake well.

60) This is a 20C solution (ratio 1/10000000000000000000000000000000000000000).

61) Take ½ teaspoon of the 20C solution and put it a bottle with 1 cup of distilled water, throw out the 20C solution.

62) Shake well.

63) This is a 21C solution (ratio 1 in 10^42 or 1/1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000).

64) Take ½ teaspoon of the 21C solution and put it a bottle with 1 cup of distilled water, throw out the 21C solution.

65) Shake well.

66) This is a 22C solution (ratio 1 in 10^44 or 1/100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000).

67) Take ½ teaspoon of the 22C solution and put it a bottle with 1 cup of distilled water, throw out the 22C solution.

68) Shake well.

69) This is a 23C solution (ratio 1 in 10^46 or 1/10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000).

70) Take ½ teaspoon of the 23C solution and put it a bottle with 1 cup of distilled water, throw out the 23C solution.

71) Shake well.

72) This is a 24C solution (ratio 1 in 10^48 or 1/1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000).

73) Take ½ teaspoon of the 24C solution and put it a bottle with 1 cup of distilled water, throw out the 24C solution.

74) Shake well.

75) This is a 25C solution (ratio 1 in 10^50 or 1/100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000).

76) Take ½ teaspoon of the 25C solution and put it a bottle with 1 cup of distilled water, throw out the 25C solution.

77) Shake well.

78) This is a 26C solution (ratio 1 in 10^52 or 1/10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000).

79) Take ½ teaspoon of the 26C solution and put it a bottle with 1 cup of distilled water, throw out the 26C solution.

80) Shake well.

81) This is a 27C solution (ratio 1 in 10^54 or 1/1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000).
(the zeros are running off of the page!)

82) Take ½ teaspoon of the 27C solution and put it a bottle with 1 cup of distilled water, throw out the 27C solution.

83) Shake well.

84) This is a 28C solution (ratio 1 in 10^56 or 1/100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000).

85) Take ½ teaspoon of the 28C solution and put it a bottle with 1 cup of distilled water, throw out the 28C solution.

86) Shake well.

87) This is a 29C solution (ratio 1 in 10^58 or 1/10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000).

88) Take ½ teaspoon of the 29C solution and put it a bottle with 1 cup of distilled water, throw out the 29C solution.

89) Shake well.

90) This is a 30C solution (ratio 1 in 10^60 or 1/1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000).

And then you are done! To make the pills, go to baking center of your grocery store and get some plain cake decorating sprinkles. You can try dropping some of the solution on the sprinkles, or just set the bottle next to the solution for it to absorb the energy (which is the typical method used for over the counter homeopathic remedies).

You can make up other remedies by knowing what the mother tincture is… For instance “Nux Vomica” (or Nux Vom) is from the Nux Vomica plant which contains the poison strychnine, Nux Sulph uses sulpher, and the stuff advertised on the radio for colds, Oscillococcinum is from duck bits.

#7 looks like someone trying to invoke Poe's Law. It's hard to tell whether it's a parody, satire, mockery, or an outright sincere expression of that view.

By Anonymous Coward (not verified) on 14 Aug 2017 #permalink

Did this case go to court? Did Kelly loose his Naturopathic Licence? If not , why not? Was it the pharmacutical fault?

Funny how it's ok for naturopaths to IV a substance that has PEG in it, yet (and yes I'm lumping all naturopaths as anti-vax) they would tell you PEG in a vaccine is incredibly toxic (ignoring that it's not even injected IV).

By Chris Hickie (not verified) on 14 Aug 2017 #permalink

Did the case go to court? Was the Natropath charged or the pharmacutical company?

"It was also noted that DEG is a central nervous system depressant, as well as a potent kidney and liver toxin that can cause kidney failure. It’s commonly used in industrial products like antifreeze and brake fluid."

Antifreeze and brake fluid? Ohhhhh, please don't do this! That's the same kind of thing antivaxxers do with, say, polysorbate 80.

Also, what dose of DEG has these depressant and toxic effects?

Also, seeking clarification: was Erick's adverse reaction an anaphylactic one? Is that what led to her cardiac arrest?

@Chris at #15. Love that recipe. Not only will it save Ms Aleman money but use up so much of her time that she won't be able to babble to anyone else.

@JR, #7. Bullshit. I am a type 1 diabetic. I use insulin and a pump.

I'd love to know how IV curcumin is supposed to treat beta thalassemia. Is it going to rebuild all of your hemoglobin molecules?

By Primary Care Doc (not verified) on 15 Aug 2017 #permalink

Molly: she died of an acute anaphalactic reaction. It was deemed an accident and the naturopath was not charged.

It's possible that could chance with the new findings, but I think it unlikely. A prosecutor would have a hard time proving criminal intent, and negligent homicide or involuntary manslaughter would be a hard sell too since naturopathy isn't actually illegal.

Civil court has a lower burden of proof but the woo prone rarely sue, and since there's no standard of care for naturopaths, it's hard to show they violated it.

if the naturopath was supposed to get a prescription and didn't, that might pave the way for a civil suit if the family is up for it. It would take years to wind through the legal system, though.

I have an out and out case of malpractice that's been sitting on my desk for SIX YEARS and I only just got deposed on it last winter, with a trial date set for November. I fully expect it to settle at the 11th hour. That's how long it takes to sue.

For anyone interested in a simplified one-step dilution, instead of Chris's tedious serial method for 30C dilution, use this:
Start with an amount of material equal to the mass of one hydrogen atom.
Add water equal to 278 million times the mass of Earth.
Shake well.
You'll need rather a lot of cake sprinkles unless you're willing to waste some of your solution.

Doug, the succession step would require a huuuuuuge bible, bound with lots of leather.

By Se Habla Espol (not verified) on 16 Aug 2017 #permalink

Duh—that should be succussion rather than succession, of course.

By Se Habla Espol (not verified) on 16 Aug 2017 #permalink

Chris, You seem to have missed a trick with your dilutions.

Why throw anything away when all of these can be diluted almost ad infinitum?

Homeopathy truly is the gift which keeps on giving.

The point was to go by Hahnemann's instructions. I had a copy of one of his books where he described it, and put a printout of that "recipe" in it at that page.

Then I sent it as a Christmas gift to my niece. She claimed it worked because her homeopath had been a chemical engineer. So the more ridiculous the steps were, the better.

Slightly OT question so I'm using an older thread:
David Noakes (the GcMAF scammer) has moved on to less specific scams, and has a new website --
as advertised at his FB page. Supposedly this "has contributions from biomedical scientists, doctors who have seen the light, and osteopaths"... not much is there yet so let's say it's a work in progress.

So Noakes' new shtik is that

[Western doctors'] success rate has dropped alarmingly. For example, in 1890 they could cure 44% of terminal stage 4 cancer patients. Today its less than 5 %, and they wheel out the dead bodies.

This is presumably a story that's going around the Scammosphere, for Noakes is not capable of inventing his own novel bullsh1t. Has anyone come across it elsewhere?

By herr doktor bimler (not verified) on 19 Aug 2017 #permalink

In 1890?

By shay simmons (not verified) on 19 Aug 2017 #permalink

Yes, that date came as a surprise.
The same IP address and Panaman server also host Noakes' other websites -- score-settling poison-pen letters targetting the various countries and agencies that have obstructed his medscamming, with names like pharmakills. pharmamurders, gcmaftruth, nofda, chemokills, mhracorrupt,,,,,

There are a few more there than when the topic last came up at RI.

By herr doktor bimler (not verified) on 19 Aug 2017 #permalink

I can only imagine "1890" with "44%" arising from some selection, distortion and conflation of William Coley's immunotherapy story that started in the 1890s at MSK.

selection, distortion and conflation of William Coley’s immunotherapy story

Helpful suggestion is helpful. Thx.

By herr doktor bimler (not verified) on 19 Aug 2017 #permalink