[The image has been removed as it seemed to be part of a spamming scam.]
I guess this just goes to show that if you throw enough species names around on your blog it'll fool the ranking mechanisms on these things. If you want to give it a try yourself, you can do so here. (I don't think Laelaps truly requires very much background to understand, though, and if it did I wouldn't be a very good blogger.) Check out how Chris, and Bora have ranked, as well.
More like this
there are many ways to rank a program: including its reputation, its performance, and more subtle quantitative indicators, some of which are contradictory and mutually inconsistent.
Later this month, the National Research Council will, finally, release the much awaited and much anticipated Data-Based Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs.
I'm trying not to obsessively check and re-check the Dog Physics Sales Rank Tracker, with limited success. One thing that jumped out at me from the recent data, though, is the big gap between the book and Kindle rankings over the weekend.
Daniel Collins of Down To Earth blog, did a little research on the power law as it applies to the recent and current standing of various (mostly science) blogs, with some interesting obervati
I don't suppose the Rutgers administration will take this as evidence that you've already graduated. . . .
If it's any consolation, or whatever, my blog is apparently just as unreadable.