Vote for your story of the year - palaeontology

This is Round Two of the NERS Stories of the Year Reader's Poll. To reiterate, or for those of you who've joined us late, I am going to select the most interesting stories from this blog over the last year by getting people to vote across a series of nine polls. Each will focus on a different theme and the last one will round-up missed stories and late-comers.

The animal behaviour poll is still going strong and this one will look at palaeontology. Here's your selection: 

More like this

The question of whether dinosaurs were warm-blooded or cold-blooded is one of the most enduring in palaeontology. Did they generate their own body heat like today's mammals; was their temperature more influenced by their environment like today's reptiles; or did they use a mixture of both…
Meet Raptorex, the "king of thieves". It's a new species of dinosaur that looks, for all intents and purposes¸ like the mighty Tyrannosaurus rex, complete with large, powerful skull and tiny, comical forearms. But there's one very important difference - it's 100 times smaller. Unlike the ever-…
I don't really like end-of-the-year lists. They seem a bit too self-knowing and forced, and there are just so many of them, particularly because we're heralding the end of a decade too. I half-expect someone to create a Top Ten Years of the Decade list (and Time Out would probably put 1977 in there…
This is Round Three of the NERS Stories of the Year Reader's Poll. In an attempt to find the most interesting posts on this blog over the last year (leave me the illusion that there were some), I'm doing a series of nine polls, each focused on a specific field of science. So far, we've had animal…

Not surprisingly, I voted for Afradapis, but not just because of the whole Ida business. I thought it was pretty neat that some adapids convergently evolved some of the same traits seen in anthropoid primates. The description helped to fill out our understanding of extinct primate diversity and relationships, so even if there had been no Ida controversy this year it still would have been a pretty significant study!

If I had better poll software and programming skills, I'd have put in a button for the Ida paper. If anyone clicked on it, they'd get a pop-up saying "Oh don't be silly. Vote again."

Not that I'm biased, but I'm pleased that four of your eight choices come from a well-known scholarly journal beginning with 'N'. However, didn't you think the Ardipithecus megasplurge in Ssss-you-know-who not worth a mention?

By cromercrox (not verified) on 07 Dec 2009 #permalink

Sadly, I didn't write about Ardipithecus because the paper came out while I was on holiday. This poll only includes things wot I wrote about, in full knowledge that I missed some big stories.

Two of the other papers do come from That Other Journal and the other two come from PLoS ONE (including the one currently in the lead).